These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25868112)
1. Of matchers and maximizers: How competition shapes choice under risk and uncertainty. Schulze C; van Ravenzwaaij D; Newell BR Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():78-98. PubMed ID: 25868112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reinforcement learning and decision making in monkeys during a competitive game. Lee D; Conroy ML; McGreevy BP; Barraclough DJ Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 22(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15561500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: intuition versus deliberation. Koehler DJ; James G Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 19664762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Banking on a bad bet. Probability matching in risky choice is linked to expectation generation. James G; Koehler DJ Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):707-11. PubMed ID: 21551340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Individual prognostic behavioral features in dogs during the choice between probability and value of reinforcement]. Chilingarian LI; Preobrazhenskaia LA; Merzhanova GKh Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2010; 60(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 20873133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Taking the easy way out? Increasing implementation effort reduces probability maximizing under cognitive load. Schulze C; Newell BR Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):806-18. PubMed ID: 26884088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Base rates versus sample accuracy: competition for control in human matching to sample. Goodie AS; Fantino E J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 10220928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of social context, reinforcer probability, and reinforcer magnitude on humans' choices to compete or not to compete. Dougherty DM; Cherek DR J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jul; 62(1):133-48. PubMed ID: 8064209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opponent Identity Influences Value Learning in Simple Games. Vickery TJ; Kleinman MR; Chun MM; Lee D J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(31):11133-43. PubMed ID: 26245974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The actor-critic learning is behind the matching law: matching versus optimal behaviors. Sakai Y; Fukai T Neural Comput; 2008 Jan; 20(1):227-51. PubMed ID: 18045007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Model-based reinforcement learning under concurrent schedules of reinforcement in rodents. Huh N; Jo S; Kim H; Sul JH; Jung MW Learn Mem; 2009 May; 16(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 19403794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of uncertainty forecasts in complex decision tasks and various weather conditions. Joslyn SL; Grounds MA J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 26479974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hold it! The influence of lingering rewards on choice diversification and persistence. Schulze C; van Ravenzwaaij D; Newell BR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1752-1767. PubMed ID: 28383956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Significance of motivation balance for a choice of dog's behavior under conditions of environmental uncertainty]. Chilingarian LI; Grigor'ian GA Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2007; 57(3):303-12. PubMed ID: 17642372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When does information about probability count in choices under risk? Tyszka T; Zaleskiewicz T Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1623-36. PubMed ID: 17184402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]