These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25869559)

  • 1. Contemporary skull development - palatal angle analysis.
    Dostalova T; Eliasova H; Gabcova D; Feberova J; Kaminek M
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2015; 116(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 25869559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Craniofacial morphology in Chinese female twins: a semi-longitudinal cephalometric study.
    Peng J; Deng H; Cao C; Ishikawa M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 16257991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative study between medieval (12th -14th c.) and modern skulls samples of five cranio-facial measures].
    Esclassan R; Noirrit E; Guyonnet JJ; Lodter C
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2006 Feb; 107(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16523172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
    Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A cephalometric study of the pterygoid process during growth].
    Harnet JC; Kahn JL; Bacon W; Sick H
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1995; 96(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7732322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric analysis of craniofacial morphology and growth in unrepaired isolated cleft palate patients.
    Xu Y; Yang C; Schreuder WH; Shi J; Shi B; Zheng Q; Wang Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1853-60. PubMed ID: 25169446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study.
    Lux CJ; Starke J; Rübel J; Stellzig A; Komposch G
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 12019012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of orthodontic intermaxillary class III mechanics on craniofacial structures. Part II - computerized cephalometrics.
    de Alba y Levy JA; Chaconas SJ; Caputo AA
    Angle Orthod; 1979 Jan; 49(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 283707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of craniofacial growth in patients with untreated Class III malocclusions and anterior crossbites using the centroid method.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 19549679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Craniofacial development in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Doğan S; Onçağ G; Akin Y
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 44(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 16298461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parental craniofacial morphology in cleft lip with or without cleft palate as determined by cephalometry: a meta-analysis.
    Weinberg SM; Maher BS; Marazita ML
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 16420271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-dimensional cephalometric analysis of the effects of subperiosteal palatal soft-tissue expansion in growing cats.
    Van Damme PA; Maltha JC; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Freihofer HP; Van't Hof MA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Jun; 99(7):1960-71. PubMed ID: 9180720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship of the functional oropharynx to craniofacial morphology.
    Trenouth MJ; Timms DJ
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 10515139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Growth and morphogenesis of the craniofacial bones. Applications in orthodontics. The concepts of J. Delaire].
    Lautrou A
    Orthod Fr; 2002 Mar; 73(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 11987531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis of the anterior and posterior length and deflection angle of the cranial base, in individuals with facial Pattern I, II and III.
    Thiesen G; Pletsch G; Zastrow MD; do Valle CV; do Valle-Corotti KM; Patel MP; Conti PC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 23876952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study.
    Yoon SS; Chung CH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25636552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Sarnat studies in craniofacial biology.
    Fan K; Andrews BT; Tabit CJ; Bradley JP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 22337371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age - a longitudinal study.
    Thordarson A; Johannsdottir B; Magnusson TE
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 16230326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The angulation of the base of the skull--a determining factor for facial skeletal development? The significance of the angulation of the base of the skull].
    Sielaff R
    Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1991; 79(5):365-73. PubMed ID: 1932431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between the cranial base and the mandible in artificially deformed skulls.
    Ferros I; Mora MJ; Obeso IF; Jimenez P; Martinez-Insua A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2016 Nov; 19(4):222-233. PubMed ID: 27506322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.