These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25869739)

  • 1. Combined effects of motor response, sensory modality, and stimulus intensity on temporal reproduction.
    Indraccolo A; Spence C; Vatakis A; Harrar V
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1189-98. PubMed ID: 25869739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis.
    Rammsayer T; Pichelmann S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2364-2377. PubMed ID: 30362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus spacing effects in duration perception are larger for auditory stimuli: data and a model.
    Penney TB; Brown GD; Wong JK
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():97-104. PubMed ID: 23978665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Opposite Distortions in Interval Timing Perception for Visual and Auditory Stimuli with Temporal Modulations.
    Yuasa K; Yotsumoto Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135646. PubMed ID: 26292285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of type of interval, sensory modality, base duration, and psychophysical task on the discrimination of brief time intervals.
    Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1185-96. PubMed ID: 24596081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory enhancement of visual temporal order judgment.
    Hairston WD; Hodges DA; Burdette JH; Wallace MT
    Neuroreport; 2006 May; 17(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 16708016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings.
    N'Diaye K; Ragot R; Garnero L; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 21(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 15464356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus duration has little effect on auditory, visual and audiovisual temporal order judgement.
    Tiippana K; Salmela VR
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 29484457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subjective shortening with filled and unfilled auditory and visual intervals in humans?
    Wearden JH; Goodson G; Foran K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1616-28. PubMed ID: 17853222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?
    Wearden JH; Todd NP; Jones LA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1709-24. PubMed ID: 16945856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus duration on audio-visual synchrony perception.
    Kuling IA; van Eijk RL; Juola JF; Kohlrausch A
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Sep; 221(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 22821079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals.
    Mayer KM; Di Luca M; Ernst MO
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():2-9. PubMed ID: 23953664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory-visual temporal integration measured by shifts in perceived temporal location.
    Jaekl PM; Harris LR
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 17428607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual-auditory interaction in saccadic reaction time: effects of auditory masker level.
    Steenken R; Colonius H; Diederich A; Rach S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():150-6. PubMed ID: 17900544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Larger visual stimuli are perceived to last longer from time to time: The internal clock is not affected by nontemporal visual stimulus size.
    Rammsayer TH; Verner M
    J Vis; 2015 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 25758710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musical training generalises across modalities and reveals efficient and adaptive mechanisms for reproducing temporal intervals.
    Aagten-Murphy D; Cappagli G; Burr D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():25-33. PubMed ID: 24184174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modality and intermittency effects on time estimation.
    Ortega L; Lopez F; Church RM
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):270-3. PubMed ID: 19429221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration.
    Matthews WJ; Stewart N; Wearden JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):303-13. PubMed ID: 20731508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.