These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

813 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25869741)

  • 21. Grasping in absence of feedback: systematic biases endure extensive training.
    Bozzacchi C; Volcic R; Domini F
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 26449965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping.
    Ozana A; Ganel T
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):2011-2021. PubMed ID: 31161415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. DF's visual brain in action: the role of tactile cues.
    Whitwell RL; Milner AD; Cavina-Pratesi C; Byrne CM; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Mar; 55():41-50. PubMed ID: 24300664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Semantic grasping escapes Weber's law.
    Löwenkamp C; Gärtner W; Haus ID; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():235-45. PubMed ID: 25731904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Violations of Weber's law tell us more about methodological challenges in sensorimotor research than about the neural correlates of visual behaviour.
    Schenk T; Utz KS; Hesse C
    Vision Res; 2017 Nov; 140():140-143. PubMed ID: 28965858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Grasping adjustments to haptic, visual, and visuo-haptic object perturbations are contingent on the sensory modality.
    Camponogara I; Volcic R
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Dec; 122(6):2614-2620. PubMed ID: 31693442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects.
    Heath M; Manzone J; Khan M; Davarpanah Jazi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3003-3012. PubMed ID: 28721517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Manual preferences for visually- and haptically-guided grasping.
    Stone KD; Gonzalez CL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():1-10. PubMed ID: 26134414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of visual and haptic feedback on grasping movements.
    Bozzacchi C; Volcic R; Domini F
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Dec; 112(12):3189-96. PubMed ID: 25231616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Programming of left hand exploits task set but that of right hand depends on recent history.
    Tang R; Zhu H
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 235(7):2215-2224. PubMed ID: 28451736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans.
    Säfström D; Edin BB
    Learn Mem; 2004; 11(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 15169866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Role of Haptic Expectations in Reaching to Grasp: From Pantomime to Natural Grasps and Back Again.
    Whitwell RL; Katz NJ; Goodale MA; Enns JT
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():588428. PubMed ID: 33391110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Grip force control during virtual object interaction: effect of force feedback,accuracy demands, and training.
    Gibo TL; Bastian AJ; Okamura AM
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2014 Mar; 7(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 24845744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set.
    Tang R; Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():49-63. PubMed ID: 25704582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gender differences in non-standard mapping tasks: A kinematic study using pantomimed reach-to-grasp actions.
    Copley-Mills J; Connolly JD; Cavina-Pratesi C
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():244-254. PubMed ID: 27410715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Grasping time does not influence the early adherence of aperture shaping to Weber's law.
    Heath M; Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():332. PubMed ID: 23267323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Grasping tiny objects.
    Giesel M; De Filippi F; Hesse C
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jul; 88(5):1678-1690. PubMed ID: 38554146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools.
    Takahashi C; Watt SJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1361-1373. PubMed ID: 28214998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On-line visual control of grasping movements.
    Volcic R; Domini F
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 234(8):2165-77. PubMed ID: 26996387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Grasping at 'thin air': multimodal contact cues for reaching and grasping.
    Zahariev MA; MacKenzie CL
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 180(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 17242914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.