BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25869850)

  • 1. Attorney beliefs concerning scientific evidence and expert witness credibility.
    Wechsler HJ; Kehn A; Wise RA; Cramer RJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 41():58-66. PubMed ID: 25869850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of the radiation safety specialist as witness: risk communication with attorneys, judges, and jurors.
    Johnson RH
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):661-9. PubMed ID: 11725884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
    Eastwood J; Caldwell J
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attorney Questions Predict Jury-eligible Adult Assessments of Attorneys, Child Witnesses, and Defendant Guilt.
    Mugno AP; Klemfuss JZ; Lyon TD
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 26932420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Courtroom whores"?--or why do attorneys call us?: findings from a survey on attorneys' use of mental health experts.
    Mossman D; Kapp MB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 9554707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
    Brodsky SL; Neal TM; Cramer RJ; Ziemke MH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 20019000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Jurors' perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility.
    McCarthy Wilcox A; NicDaeid N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():100-108. PubMed ID: 30216840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From mental health professional to expert witness: testifying in court.
    Bank SC
    New Dir Ment Health Serv; 2001; (91):57-66. PubMed ID: 11589072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Promoting ethical and objective practice in the medicolegal arena of disability evaluation.
    Martelli MF; Zasler ND; Johnson-Greene D
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2001 Aug; 12(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 11478189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attorneys' requests for complete tax records from opposing expert witnesses: some approaches to the problem.
    Gutheil TG; Simon RI; Simpson S
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 17185482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From mental health professional to expert witness: testifying in court.
    Bank SC
    New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1996; (69):5-14. PubMed ID: 8935818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of District Judges and Lawyers Towards Medico-legal Reports, Medical Certificates and Medical Expert Opinion.
    Subedi N; Giri HR
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2018; 56(212):735-739. PubMed ID: 30387459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attorneys' pressures on the expert witness: early warning signs of endangered honesty, objectivity, and fair compensation.
    Gutheil TG; Simon RI
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):546-53; discussion 554-62. PubMed ID: 10638783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender, smiling, and witness credibility in actual trials.
    Nagle JE; Brodsky SL; Weeter K
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 24634058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expert witness testimony: rules of engagement.
    Satiani B
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2006; 40(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 16703210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer-reviewed forensic consultation in practice: multidisciplinary oversight in common expertise.
    Welner M; Davey EE; Bernstein A
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Sep; 59(5):1254-9. PubMed ID: 24593117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variations in reliability and validity do not influence judge, attorney, and mock juror decisions about psychological expert evidence.
    Chorn JA; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Dec; 43(6):542-557. PubMed ID: 31524421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender and the experience of mental health expert witness testimony.
    Kaempf AC; Baxter P; Packer IK; Pinals DA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 25770280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A nationwide questionnaire survey of medical experts in mental health evaluation].
    Koike J; Morita N; Nakatani Y
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 19301591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Closing with emotion: The differential impact of male versus female attorneys expressing anger in court.
    Salerno JM; Phalen HJ; Reyes RN; Schweitzer NJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):385-401. PubMed ID: 29939063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.