These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25870044)

  • 1. Exploring the effect of the occurrence of sound on force applied by the ear when listening at a surface.
    Meijerman L; Nagelkerke N; Brand R; van der Lugt C; van Basten R; De Conti F; Giacon M; Maat G
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2005 Sep; 1(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 25870044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter- and intra-individual variation in applied force when listening at a surface, and resulting variation in earprints.
    Meijerman L; Nagelkerke NJ; Van Basten R; Van Der Lugt C; De Conti F; Drusini AG; Giacon M; Sholl S; Vanezis P; Maat GJ
    Med Sci Law; 2006 Apr; 46(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16683469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of listening environment and earphone style on preferred listening levels of normal hearing adults using an MP3 player.
    Hodgetts WE; Rieger JM; Szarko RA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 17485978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low body mass index and jaw movement are protective of hearing in users of personal listening devices.
    Li LP; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Tung TH; Chen JK
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Aug; 123(8):1983-7. PubMed ID: 23553325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of static force on round window stimulation with the direct acoustic cochlea stimulator.
    Maier H; Salcher R; Schwab B; Lenarz T
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():115-24. PubMed ID: 23276731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1724. PubMed ID: 17927432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.
    Foundas AL; Corey DM; Hurley MM; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 15622019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferred sound levels of portable music players and listening habits among adults: a field study.
    Kähäri KR; Aslund T; Olsson J
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(50):9-15. PubMed ID: 21173482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle.
    Litovsky RY; Johnstone PM; Godar S; Agrawal S; Parkinson A; Peters R; Lake J
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 16446564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Listening effort with cochlear implants: Unilateral versus bilateral use].
    Schnabl J; Bumann B; Rehbein M; Müller O; Seidler H; Wolf-Magele A; Sprinzl G; Windfuhr J; Weichbold V
    HNO; 2015 Aug; 63(8):546-51. PubMed ID: 26169210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of stimulus intensity on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening.
    Hugdahl K; Westerhausen R; Alho K; Medvedev S; Hämäläinen H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 431(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 18162310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Output capabilities of personal music players and assessment of preferred listening levels of test subjects: outlining recommendations for preventing music-induced hearing loss.
    Breinbauer HA; Anabalón JL; Gutierrez D; Cárcamo R; Olivares C; Caro J
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Nov; 122(11):2549-56. PubMed ID: 23060148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Everyday Listening Performance of Children Before and After Receiving a Second Cochlear Implant: Results Using the Parent Version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.
    Galvin KL; Mok M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 26418045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect on directional hearing in hunters using amplifying (level dependent) hearing protectors.
    Borg E; Bergkvist C; Bagger-Sjöbäck D
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):579-85. PubMed ID: 18520633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deployment of fingertip forces in tactile exploration.
    Smith AM; Gosselin G; Houde B
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 12410336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort.
    Feuerstein JF
    Ear Hear; 1992 Apr; 13(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 1601196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extinction of auditory stimuli in hemineglect: Space versus ear.
    Spierer L; Meuli R; Clarke S
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):540-51. PubMed ID: 16753189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.