These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25870555)

  • 1. Bimanual elbow robotic orthoses: preliminary investigations on an impairment force-feedback rehabilitation method.
    Herrnstadt G; Alavi N; Randhawa BK; Boyd LA; Menon C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():169. PubMed ID: 25870555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bimanual elbow exoskeleton: Force based protocol and rehabilitation quantification.
    Alavi N; Herrnstadt G; Randhawa BK; Boyd LA; Menon C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():4643-6. PubMed ID: 26737329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bilateral Tactile Feedback-Enabled Training for Stroke Survivors Using Microsoft Kinect
    Orand A; Erdal Aksoy E; Miyasaka H; Weeks Levy C; Zhang X; Menon C
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Aug; 19(16):. PubMed ID: 31398957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical usefulness and validity of robotic measures of reaching movement in hemiparetic stroke patients.
    Otaka E; Otaka Y; Kasuga S; Nishimoto A; Yamazaki K; Kawakami M; Ushiba J; Liu M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 12():66. PubMed ID: 26265327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
    Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
    Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coupled Bimanual Training Using a Non-Powered Device for Individuals with Severe Hemiparesis: A Pilot Study.
    Raghavan P; Aluru V; Milani S; Thai P; Geller D; Bilaloglu S; Lu Y; Weisz DJ
    Int J Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 29034265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Construction of efficacious gait and upper limb functional interventions based on brain plasticity evidence and model-based measures for stroke patients.
    Daly JJ; Ruff RL
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2007 Dec; 7():2031-45. PubMed ID: 18167618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke.
    Chang JJ; Tung WL; Wu WL; Huang MH; Su FC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 17908578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of upper limb position sense using an exoskeleton and a virtual reality display.
    Deblock-Bellamy A; Batcho CS; Mercier C; Blanchette AK
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):24. PubMed ID: 29548326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic Rehabilitation and Multimodal Instrumented Assessment of Post-stroke Elbow Motor Functions-A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.
    Pilla A; Trigili E; McKinney Z; Fanciullacci C; Malasoma C; Posteraro F; Crea S; Vitiello N
    Front Neurol; 2020; 11():587293. PubMed ID: 33193052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Single-Session Preliminary Evaluation of an Affordable BCI-Controlled Arm Exoskeleton and Motor-Proprioception Platform.
    Elnady AM; Zhang X; Xiao ZG; Yong X; Randhawa BK; Boyd L; Menon C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():168. PubMed ID: 25870554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of arm training with the robotic device ARMin I in chronic stroke: three single cases.
    Nef T; Quinter G; Müller R; Riener R
    Neurodegener Dis; 2009; 6(5-6):240-51. PubMed ID: 19940461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-based ACTive somatoSENSory (Act.Sens) retraining on upper limb functions with chronic stroke survivors: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Sidarta A; Lim YC; Kuah CWK; Loh YJ; Ang WT
    Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2021 Nov; 7(1):207. PubMed ID: 34782024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) and robot hybrid system for multi-joint coordinated upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.
    Rong W; Li W; Pang M; Hu J; Wei X; Yang B; Wai H; Zheng X; Hu X
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 14(1):34. PubMed ID: 28446181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke.
    Lum PS; Burgar CG; Shor PC; Majmundar M; Van der Loos M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Jul; 83(7):952-9. PubMed ID: 12098155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary Assessment of a Postural Synergy-Based Exoskeleton for Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
    He C; Xiong CH; Chen ZJ; Fan W; Huang XL; Fu C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():1795-1805. PubMed ID: 34428146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design and Preliminary Evaluation of a Tongue-Operated Exoskeleton System for Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
    Zhang Z; Prilutsky BI; Butler AJ; Shinohara M; Ghovanloo M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
    Masiero S; Armani M; Ferlini G; Rosati G; Rossi A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 24316679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Erratum.
    Mult Scler; 2016 Oct; 22(12):NP9-NP11. PubMed ID: 26041800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.