These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25871463)
1. Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity? Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Gheorghes TN; Galatsidas M Br J Psychol; 2016 Feb; 107(1):154-78. PubMed ID: 25871463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing Angular and Curved Shapes in Terms of Implicit Associations and Approach/Avoidance Responses. Palumbo L; Ruta N; Bertamini M PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140043. PubMed ID: 26460610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An advantage for smooth compared with angular contours in the speed of processing shape. Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Redies C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1304-1318. PubMed ID: 31282695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity to curvature deformations along closed contours. Slugocki M; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ J Vis; 2019 Nov; 19(13):7. PubMed ID: 31715630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shape familiarity modulates preference for curvature in drawings of common-use objects. Chuquichambi EG; Palumbo L; Rey C; Munar E PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11772. PubMed ID: 34268016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of presentation time on preference for curvature of real objects and meaningless novel patterns. Corradi G; Rosselló-Mir J; Vañó J; Chuquichambi E; Bertamini M; Munar E Br J Psychol; 2019 Nov; 110(4):670-685. PubMed ID: 30536967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Curve Appeal: Exploring Individual Differences in Preference for Curved Versus Angular Objects. Cotter KN; Silvia PJ; Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Vartanian O Iperception; 2017; 8(2):2041669517693023. PubMed ID: 28491269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. View rotation is used to perceive path curvature from optic flow. Saunders JA J Vis; 2010 Nov; 10(13):25. PubMed ID: 21149308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of gender and academic degree on preference for smooth curvature of abstract shapes. Palumbo L; Rampone G; Bertamini M PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10877. PubMed ID: 33732544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of constant curvature in 2-D contour shape representations. Garrigan P; Kellman PJ Perception; 2011; 40(11):1290-308. PubMed ID: 22416588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beauty and the sharp fangs of the beast: degree of angularity predicts perceived preference and threat. Friedenberg J; Lauria G; Hennig K; Gardner I Psychol Res; 2023 Nov; 87(8):2594-2602. PubMed ID: 37027040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection and recognition of angular frequency patterns. Wilson HR; Propp R Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt A):51-6. PubMed ID: 25782363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aesthetic sensitivity to curvature in real objects and abstract designs. Corradi G; Belman M; Currò T; Chuquichambi EG; Rey C; Nadal M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():124-130. PubMed ID: 31146089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual discrimination, categorical identification, and categorical rating in brief displays of curved lines: implications for discrete encoding processes. Foster DH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Oct; 9(5):785-806. PubMed ID: 6227689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Saliency of Angular Shapes in Threatening and Nonthreatening Faces. Watier N Perception; 2018 Mar; 47(3):306-329. PubMed ID: 29310526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Bar M; Neta M Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(10):2191-200. PubMed ID: 17462678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Phase capture" in amblyopia: the influence function for sampled shape. Levi DM; Li RW; Klein SA Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1793-805. PubMed ID: 15797769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Angular Versus Curved Shapes: Correspondences and Emotional Processing. Blazhenkova O; Kumar MM Perception; 2018 Jan; 47(1):67-89. PubMed ID: 28927319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The shape of the pill: Perceived effects, evoked bodily sensations and emotions. Blazhenkova O; Dogerlioglu-Demir K PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238378. PubMed ID: 32898184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radial frequency adaptation suggests polar-based coding of local shape cues. Bell J; Dickinson JE; Badcock DR Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2293-301. PubMed ID: 18675841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]