847 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25871669)
1. Survival and outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Chikwe J; Chiang YP; Egorova NN; Itagaki S; Adams DH
JAMA; 2015 Apr; 313(14):1435-42. PubMed ID: 25871669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old.
Kaneko T; Aranki S; Javed Q; McGurk S; Shekar P; Davidson M; Cohn L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24079878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival and long-term outcomes after mitral valve replacement in patients aged 18 to 50 years.
Schnittman SR; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Adams DH; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jan; 155(1):96-102.e11. PubMed ID: 28942968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.
Hammermeister KE; Sethi GK; Henderson WG; Oprian C; Kim T; Rahimtoola S
N Engl J Med; 1993 May; 328(18):1289-96. PubMed ID: 8469251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.
Schnittman SR; Adams DH; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):539-547.e9. PubMed ID: 29110948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Choice of replacement valve in the elderly.
Kobayashi Y; Eishi K; Nagata S; Nakano K; Sasako Y; Kobayashi J; Kosakai Y; Miyatake K
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 9263873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcomes of mitral valve replacement in dialysis patients: evidence from a nationwide database.
Yang KJ; Fu HY; Chang CJ; Wang TC; Wang CH; Chou NK; Wu IH; Hsu RB; Huang SC; Yu HY; Chen YS; Chi NH
Int J Surg; 2023 Dec; 109(12):3778-3787. PubMed ID: 37678297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical valve replacement versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in the tricuspid valve position.
Cho WC; Park CB; Kim JB; Jung SH; Chung CH; Choo SJ; Lee JW
J Card Surg; 2013 May; 28(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 23488674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement with mechanical or biological substitutes: a 20 years cohort.
Ribeiro AH; Wender OC; de Almeida AS; Soares LE; Picon PD
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2014 Oct; 14():146. PubMed ID: 25326757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement for infective endocarditis in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Hu X; Jiang W; Xie M; Guo R; Yim WY; Dong N; Wang Y
Clin Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 43(10):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 32497339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the utilization and in-hospital outcomes of surgical mitral valve replacement in Spain (2001-2015).
López-de-Andrés A; de Miguel-Díez J; Muñoz-Rivas N; Hernández-Barrera V; Méndez-Bailón M; de Miguel-Yanes JM; Jiménez-García R
Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2019 May; 18(1):60. PubMed ID: 31077189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival and Long-Term Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 55 to 65 Years.
Alex S; Hiebert B; Arora R; Menkis A; Shah P
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):313-321. PubMed ID: 28511244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch After Mitral Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score Analysis.
Hwang HY; Kim YH; Kim KH; Kim KB; Ahn H
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 May; 101(5):1796-802. PubMed ID: 26794895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
