These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2587184)
1. Aging is associated with increased Weber ratios for caffeine, but not for sucrose. Gilmore MM; Murphy C Percept Psychophys; 1989 Dec; 46(6):555-9. PubMed ID: 2587184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Age and sex effects on taste of sucrose, NaCl, citric acid and caffeine. Hyde RJ; Feller RP Neurobiol Aging; 1981; 2(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 7335149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality-specific effects of aging on the human taste system. Murphy C; Gilmore MM Percept Psychophys; 1989 Feb; 45(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 2928073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age-associated increases in intensity discrimination for taste. Nordin S; Razani LJ; Markison S; Murphy C Exp Aging Res; 2003; 29(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 12775444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in taste and flavor in aging. Stevens JC; Cain WS Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 1993; 33(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 8424851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of sweeteners on bitter taste in young and elderly subjects. Schiffman SS; Gatlin LA; Sattely-Miller EA; Graham BG; Heiman SA; Stagner WC; Erickson RP Brain Res Bull; 1994; 35(3):189-204. PubMed ID: 7812797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensory evaluations of fat-sucrose and fat-salt mixtures: relationship to age and weight status. Warwick ZS; Schiffman SS Physiol Behav; 1990 Nov; 48(5):633-6. PubMed ID: 2082362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of linoleic acid on sweet, sour, salty, and bitter taste thresholds and intensity ratings of adults. Mattes RD Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2007 May; 292(5):G1243-8. PubMed ID: 17290007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of caffeine on energy content of sugar-sweetened beverages: 'the caffeine-calorie effect'. Keast RS; Sayompark D; Sacks G; Swinburn BA; Riddell LJ Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Dec; 65(12):1338-44. PubMed ID: 21772315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recalling sweet taste intensities in the presence and absence of other tastes. Vanne M; Tuorila H; Laurinen P Chem Senses; 1998 Jun; 23(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 9669042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age and diabetes effects on threshold and hedonic perception of sucrose solutions. Dye CJ; Koziatek DA J Gerontol; 1981 May; 36(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 7229277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Taste perception with age: generic or specific losses in threshold sensitivity to the five basic tastes? Mojet J; Christ-Hazelhof E; Heidema J Chem Senses; 2001 Sep; 26(7):845-60. PubMed ID: 11555480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Taste difference thresholds for sucrose in two species of nonhuman primates. Laska M; Scheuber HP; Carrera Sanchez E; Rodriguez Luna E Am J Primatol; 1999; 48(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 10333434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the ability of 8-9-year-old children and adults to detect taste stimuli. James CE; Laing DG; Oram N Physiol Behav; 1997 Jul; 62(1):193-7. PubMed ID: 9226362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influences of age, tongue region, and chorda tympani nerve sectioning on signal detection measures of lingual taste sensitivity. Doty RL; Heidt JM; MacGillivray MR; Dsouza M; Tracey EH; Mirza N; Bigelow D Physiol Behav; 2016 Mar; 155():202-7. PubMed ID: 26703236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of physical exercise on human preferences for various taste solutions. Horio T; Kawamura Y Chem Senses; 1998 Aug; 23(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perception of sweetness and bitterness in different vehicles. Calviño AM; García-Medina MR; Cometto-Muñiz JE; Rodríguez MB Percept Psychophys; 1993 Dec; 54(6):751-8. PubMed ID: 8134244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of tastes in mixture with other tastes: issues of masking and aging. Stevens JC Chem Senses; 1996 Apr; 21(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 8670700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Just Noticeable Differences and Weber Fraction of Oral Thickness Perception of Model Beverages. Camacho S; Dop M; de Graaf C; Stieger M J Food Sci; 2015 Jul; 80(7):S1583-8. PubMed ID: 26053966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]