496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25871871)
1. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.
Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Roberts CJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17188041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraocular Pressure Changes and Relationship With Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK.
Li H; Wang Y; Dou R; Wei P; Zhang J; Zhao W; Li L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 57(10):4180-6. PubMed ID: 27548888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraocular pressure evaluation in healthy eyes and diseased ones using contact and non contact devices.
Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Mele L; Carnevale UA; Irregolare C; Lanza A; Femiano F; Bifani M
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Apr; 39(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 26481062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Mahmoud AM; Yoon EY; Roberts CJ; Pepose JS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1774-88. PubMed ID: 19781475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.
Zhang Y; Zheng L; Bian A; Zhou Q
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):697-703. PubMed ID: 28444523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction.
Chen KJ; Joda A; Vinciguerra R; Eliasy A; Sefat SMM; Kook D; Geraghty B; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 May; 44(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 29685776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraocular pressure instrument reading comparisons after LASIK.
Fan F; Li C; Li Y; Duan X; Pan D
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 88(7):850-4. PubMed ID: 21499165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C on corneal biomechanical features.
Zare M; Feizi S; Azimzadeh A; Esfandiari H
Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jun; 37(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22577762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in ocular biomechanics after femtosecond laser creation of a laser in situ keratomileusis flap.
Leccisotti A; Fields SV; Moore J; Shah S; Moore TC
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 26948787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Laser in Situ Keratomileusis on Schiøtz, Goldmann, and Dynamic Contour Tonometric Measurements.
Sales-Sanz M; Arranz-Marquez E; Piñero DP; Arruabarrena C; Mikropoulos DG; Teus MA
J Glaucoma; 2016 Apr; 25(4):e419-23. PubMed ID: 26550981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraocular pressure after myopic laser refractive surgery measured with a new Goldmann convex prism: correlations with GAT and ORA.
Iglesias M; Kudsieh B; Laiseca A; Santos C; Nadal J; Barraquer R; Casaroli-Marano RP
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):79. PubMed ID: 35168601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry.
Pedersen IB; Bak-Nielsen S; Vestergaard AH; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 252(8):1329-35. PubMed ID: 24862302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
