185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25872415)
1. Long-term cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX® versus current clinical practice from a Dutch cost perspective.
Kip M; Monteban H; Steuten L
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):433-45. PubMed ID: 25872415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting.
Blohmer JU; Rezai M; Kümmel S; Kühn T; Warm M; Friedrichs K; Benkow A; Valentine WJ; Eiermann W
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 22966753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic profile of breast cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Healthcare System perspective.
Seguí MÁ; Crespo C; Cortés J; Lluch A; Brosa M; Becerra V; Chiavenna SM; Gracia A
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Dec; 14(6):889-99. PubMed ID: 25213317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.
Klang SH; Hammerman A; Liebermann N; Efrat N; Doberne J; Hornberger J
Value Health; 2010; 13(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 20412544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic Impact of Gene Expression Profiling in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer in France.
Katz G; Romano O; Foa C; Vataire AL; Chantelard JV; Hervé R; Barletta H; Durieux A; Martin JP; Salmon R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128880. PubMed ID: 26086912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model.
Yang M; Rajan S; Issa AM
Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(20):5163-70. PubMed ID: 22359236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cost-consequence model of using the 21-gene assay to identify patients with early-stage node-positive breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands.
Simons MJHG; Machielsen PM; Spoorendonk JA; Ignacio T; Drost PB; Jacobs T; de Jongh FE
J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):445-454. PubMed ID: 38436289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic evaluation of genomic test-directed chemotherapy for early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer.
Hall PS; McCabe C; Stein RC; Cameron D
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Jan; 104(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 22138097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.
Harnan S; Tappenden P; Cooper K; Stevens J; Bessey A; Rafia R; Ward S; Wong R; Stein RC; Brown J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(30):1-328. PubMed ID: 31264581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-utility of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in node-negative and node-positive breast cancer.
Lamond NW; Skedgel C; Rayson D; Lethbridge L; Younis T
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jun; 133(3):1115-23. PubMed ID: 22361999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.
Delea TE; Karnon J; Smith RE; Johnston SR; Brandman J; Sung JC; Gross PE
Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jul; 12(7):374-86. PubMed ID: 16834524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer.
Liberato NL; Marchetti M; Barosi G
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Feb; 25(6):625-33. PubMed ID: 17308267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of 3-year vs 1-year adjuvant therapy with imatinib in patients with high risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumour recurrence in the Netherlands; a modelling study alongside the SSGXVIII/AIO trial.
Majer IM; Gelderblom H; van den Hout WB; Gray E; Verheggen BG
J Med Econ; 2013 Sep; 16(9):1106-19. PubMed ID: 23808902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. To (genetic) test or not to test, that is the question.
Mushlin AI
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):429-31. PubMed ID: 26388528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Budget impact analysis of gene expression tests to aid therapy decisions for breast cancer patients in Germany.
Lux MP; Nabieva N; Hildebrandt T; Rebscher H; Kümmel S; Blohmer JU; Schrauder MG
Breast; 2018 Feb; 37():89-98. PubMed ID: 29128582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A decision impact, decision conflict and economic assessment of routine Oncotype DX testing of 146 women with node-negative or pNImi, ER-positive breast cancer in the U.K.
Holt S; Bertelli G; Humphreys I; Valentine W; Durrani S; Pudney D; Rolles M; Moe M; Khawaja S; Sharaiha Y; Brinkworth E; Whelan S; Jones S; Bennett H; Phillips CJ
Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(11):2250-8. PubMed ID: 23695023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Economic assessment of the routine use of Oncotype DX® assay for early breast cancer in Franche-Comte region].
Nerich V; Curtit E; Bazan F; Montcuquet P; Villanueva C; Chaigneau L; Cals L; Méneveau N; Dobi E; Altmotlak H; Algros MP; Choulot MJ; Nallet G; Limat S; Mansion S; Pivot X
Bull Cancer; 2014; 101(7-8):681-9. PubMed ID: 25091650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cost-effectiveness of a chemotherapy predictive test].
Vataire AL; Laas E; Aballéa S; Gligorov J; Rouzier R; Chéreau E
Bull Cancer; 2012 Oct; 99(10):907-14. PubMed ID: 23041366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test in node-positive early breast cancer.
Berdunov V; Millen S; Paramore A; Hall P; Perren T; Brown R; Griffin J; Reynia S; Fryer N; Longworth L
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):591-604. PubMed ID: 35416089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating Tumor Characteristics to Maximize 21-Gene Assay Utility: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Wang SY; Chen T; Dang W; Mougalian SS; Evans SB; Gross CP
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2019 Jan; 17(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30659128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
