These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25872703)

  • 1. The Impact of an ECV Service is Limited by Antenatal Breech Detection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Hemelaar J; Lim LN; Impey LW
    Birth; 2015 Jun; 42(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 25872703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
    Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
    Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls.
    Balayla J; Dahdouh EM; Villeneuve S; Boucher M; Gauthier RJ; Audibert F; Fuchs F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 24853490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation].
    Coppola C; Mottet N; Mariet AS; Baeza C; Poitrey E; Bourtembourg A; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 27125381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Management of breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience.
    Burgos J; Rodríguez L; Cobos P; Osuna C; Del Mar Centeno M; Larrieta R; Martínez-Astorquiza T; Fernández-Llebrez L
    J Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 35(10):803-8. PubMed ID: 26181721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.
    de Gregorio N; Friedl T; Schramm A; Reister F; Janni W; Ebner F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(5):477-481. PubMed ID: 28848185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of a routine late third trimester growth scan on the incidence, diagnosis, and management of breech presentation in Oxfordshire, UK: A cohort study.
    Salim I; Staines-Urias E; Mathewlynn S; Drukker L; Vatish M; Impey L
    PLoS Med; 2021 Jan; 18(1):e1003503. PubMed ID: 33449926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
    Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation].
    Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 31678503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years' experience.
    Melo P; Georgiou EX; Hedditch A; Ellaway P; Impey L
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 30223309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section.
    Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM
    East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit].
    Kuppens SM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Huibers M; Franssen MJ; de Becker BM; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jun; 152(23):1323-8. PubMed ID: 18661859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting the success of moxibustion in the management of a breech presentation as a preliminary treatment to external cephalic version.
    Manyande A; Grabowska C
    Midwifery; 2009 Dec; 25(6):774-80. PubMed ID: 19853333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners.
    Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Barrett J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Oct; 24(10):804-10. PubMed ID: 12399807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version.
    Basu A; Flatley C; Kumar S
    J Perinatol; 2016 Jun; 36(6):439-42. PubMed ID: 26796127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery.
    Sela HY; Fiegenberg T; Ben-Meir A; Elchalal U; Ezra Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Feb; 142(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19019528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in external cephalic version: prognostic factors for the success of the technique.
    Trobo D; Pintado P; Ortega V; Yllana F; Hernández C; Mendizábal R; De León-Luis J
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Sep; 47(7):717-723. PubMed ID: 31369397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Matched cohort study of external cephalic version in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Keepanasseril A; Anand K; Soundara Raghavan S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 138(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 28380246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Delivery outcomes in subsequent pregnancy following primary breech cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.
    Eden-Friedman Y; Ginosar Y; Sela HY; Calderon-Margalit R; Eventov-Friedman S; Ezra Y; Weiniger CF
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 May; 33(9):1554-1560. PubMed ID: 30207183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.