BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25872859)

  • 1. Are you dense?
    Evers K
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jun; 22(6):677-8. PubMed ID: 25872859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of the new density reporting laws: radiologist perceptions and actual behavior.
    Gur D; Klym AH; King JL; Bandos AI; Sumkin JH
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jun; 22(6):679-83. PubMed ID: 25837723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International studies make case for high mammo volume.
    Ward P
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Jan; Suppl():9-11. PubMed ID: 10848423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does practice make perfect when interpreting mammography?
    Elmore JG; Carney PA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Mar; 94(5):321-3. PubMed ID: 11880465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Malpractice and breast cancer: perceptions versus reality.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):334-6. PubMed ID: 19155391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reader practice in mammography screen reading in Australia.
    Cawson J
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Dec; 53(6):514-5. PubMed ID: 20002281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physicians' opinions and use of controversial technologies. The case of mammographic screening in Norway.
    Kristiansen IS; Natvig NL; Sager EM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1995; 11(2):316-26. PubMed ID: 7790174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer: when and how often to get screened. How do you make sense of conflicting mammography guidelines?
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2013 Oct; 21(2):3. PubMed ID: 24432454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey of Alabama physicians' use of mammography, 1989.
    Lorino CO; Green AE; Harris JM
    South Med J; 1990 Nov; 83(11):1280-2, 1288. PubMed ID: 2237556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
    Rozenberg S; Ham H; Liebens F
    Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2167-8. PubMed ID: 11784658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of physicians in mammography referral for older Caribbean women in Canada.
    Hyman I; Singh M; Ahmad F; Austin L; Meana M; George U; Wells LM; Stewart D
    Medscape Womens Health; 2001 Oct; 6(5):6. PubMed ID: 11698928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Practice Patterns Following 2011 FDA Approval: A Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists.
    Gao Y; Babb JS; Toth HK; Moy L; Heller SL
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):947-953. PubMed ID: 28188043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors associated with breast screening radiologists' annual mammogram reading volume in Italy.
    Morrone D; Giordano L; Artuso F; Bernardi D; Fedato C; Frigerio A; Giorgi D; Naldoni C; Saguatti G; Severi D; Taffurelli M; Terribile D; Ventura L; Bucchi L
    Radiol Med; 2016 Jul; 121(7):557-63. PubMed ID: 27033475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer screening beliefs by practice location.
    Santora LM; Mahoney MC; Lawvere S; Englert JJ; Symons AB; Mirand AL
    BMC Public Health; 2003 Feb; 3():9. PubMed ID: 12646070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Delay from symptom to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in Washington State and British Columbia.
    Katz SJ; Hislop TG; Thomas DB; Larson EB
    Med Care; 1993 Mar; 31(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 8450682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do as I do, not as I say.
    Paskett ED
    Arch Fam Med; 1997; 6(6):549-50. PubMed ID: 9371048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations?
    Nutting PA; Baier M; Werner JJ; Cutter G; Conry C; Stewart L
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 2001; 14(5):352-61. PubMed ID: 11572540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ACR BI-RADS Use in Low-Income Countries: An Analysis of Diagnostic Breast Ultrasound Practice in Uganda.
    Scheel JR; Nealey EM; Orem J; Bugeza S; Muyinda Z; Nathan RO; Porter PL; Lehman CD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Feb; 13(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 26419306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer screening: another point of view.
    de la Haba Rodríguez JR; Chamorro RM; Vidal MJ; Blanch RS; Beltrán LT; Benito MA; Cabezas SG; Carrasco AJ; Aguilar EA
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15677889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the yield of positive breast biopsies: a statistical analysis of mammographic patterns in a private practice.
    Lasser JL; Lasser S
    R I Med; 1994 Feb; 77(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 8161858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.