These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25872891)
1. Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Kim HS; Kim K; Ryoo SB; Seo JH; Kim SY; Park JW; Kim MA; Hong KS; Jeong CW; Song YS; J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 25872891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction. Wu J; Ye T; Lv J; He Z; Zhu J J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):417-426.e6. PubMed ID: 30359783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa). Kietpeerakool C; Aue-Aungkul A; Galaal K; Ngamjarus C; Lumbiganon P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 2(2):CD012828. PubMed ID: 30746689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: time for a new standard of care for cervical cancer? Sakuragi N J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):81-2. PubMed ID: 25872887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function]. Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective study of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical carcinoma in Taiwan. Tseng CJ; Shen HP; Lin YH; Lee CY; Wei-Cheng Chiu W Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 22482969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parametrial dissection during laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a new approach aims to improve patients' postoperative quality of life. Ceccaroni M; Pontrelli G; Spagnolo E; Scioscia M; Bruni F; Paglia A; Minelli L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 202(3):320.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20096819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China. Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of pelvic visceral functions after modified nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Wang W; Li B; Zuo J; Zhang G; Yang Y; Zeng H; Li X; Wu L Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 24534225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Long Y; Yao DS; Pan XW; Ou TY PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94116. PubMed ID: 24748015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in the case of cervical cancer]. Trimbos JB; Maas CP; Deruiter MC; Kenter GG Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Jul; 147(28):1344-7. PubMed ID: 12892008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases]. Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nerve-Sparing Approach Improves Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Bogani G; Rossetti DO; Ditto A; Signorelli M; Martinelli F; Mosca L; Scaffa C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Chiappa V; Sabatucci I; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):402-410. PubMed ID: 29191471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bladder function after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Laterza RM; Sievert KD; de Ridder D; Vierhout ME; Haab F; Cardozo L; van Kerrebroeck P; Cruz F; Kelleher C; Chapple C; Espuña-Pons M; Koelbl H Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Apr; 34(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 24519734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Type II versus Type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Raspagliesi F; Ditto A; Fontanelli R; Zanaboni F; Solima E; Spatti G; Hanozet F; Vecchione F; Rossi G; Kusamura S Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 16445968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients. Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Bogani G; Sturla D; Serati M; Bolis P Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 23339145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study]. Ju XZ; Li ZT; Yang HJ; Wu XH Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):605-9. PubMed ID: 20003790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomic identification of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure. Fujii S Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2 Suppl):S33-41. PubMed ID: 18752840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sexual, bladder and bowel function following different minimally invasive techniques of radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Baessler K; Windemut S; Chiantera V; Köhler C; Sehouli J Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Nov; 23(11):2335-2343. PubMed ID: 34003456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]