These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25873233)
1. Surgeon, staff, and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: impact of 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation partially replacing conventional fluoroscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Hubbe U; Sircar R; Scheiwe C; Scholz C; Kogias E; Krüger MT; Volz F; Klingler JH Trials; 2015 Apr; 16():142. PubMed ID: 25873233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Conventional Fluoroscopy and 3D Fluoroscopy-based Navigation. Klingler JH; Scholz C; Krüger MT; Naseri Y; Volz F; Hohenhaus M; Brönner J; Hoedlmoser H; Sircar R; Hubbe U Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Jan; 46(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32925679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation Exposure to Scrub Nurse, Assistant Surgeon, and Anesthetist in Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery Comparing 2D Conventional Fluoroscopy With 3D Fluoroscopy-based Navigation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Klingler JH; Scholz C; Hohenhaus M; Volz F; Naseri Y; Krüger MT; Vasilikos I; Roelz R; Brönner J; Hoedlmoser H; Sircar R; Hubbe U Clin Spine Surg; 2021 May; 34(4):E211-E215. PubMed ID: 32991363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of navigation-assisted fluoroscopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery. Kim CW; Lee YP; Taylor W; Oygar A; Kim WK Spine J; 2008; 8(4):584-90. PubMed ID: 18586198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pedicle screw placement accuracy using ultra-low radiation imaging with image enhancement versus conventional fluoroscopy in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an internally randomized controlled trial. Nayar G; Blizzard DJ; Wang TY; Cook S; Back AG; Vincent D; Karikari IO J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Feb; 28(2):186-193. PubMed ID: 29192879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of ultrasound volume navigation, O-arm navigation, and X-ray guidance for screw placement in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized controlled trial. Lin X; Chang Q; Shang L; Shen S; Fu Z; Zhao G Eur Spine J; 2024 Sep; 33(9):3457-3466. PubMed ID: 38980367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internally Randomized Control Trial of Radiation Exposure Using Ultra-low Radiation Imaging Versus Traditional C-arm Fluoroscopy for Patients Undergoing Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Wang TY; Farber SH; Perkins SS; Back AG; Byrd SA; Chi D; Vincent D; Karikari IO Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Feb; 42(4):217-223. PubMed ID: 28207655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Assessment of the surgeon radiation exposure during a minimally invasive TLIF: Comparison between fluoroscopy and O-arm system]. Grelat M; Zairi F; Quidet M; Marinho P; Allaoui M; Assaker R Neurochirurgie; 2015 Aug; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 26072227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Free-Hand MIS TLIF without 3D Navigation-How to Achieve Low Radiation Exposure for Both Surgeon and Patient. Doria-Medina R; Hubbe U; Scholz C; Sircar R; Brönner J; Hoedlmoser H; Klingler JH J Clin Med; 2023 Aug; 12(15):. PubMed ID: 37568527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between O-Arm Navigated and C-Arm Guided Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Chang CC; Chang HK; Wu JC; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC World Neurosurg; 2020 Jul; 139():e489-e495. PubMed ID: 32311567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation exposure to surgeon in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with novel spinal locators. Fan G; Fu Q; Gu G; Zhang H; Guan X; Zhang L; Gu X; He S J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E173-80. PubMed ID: 25353207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimising radiation exposure to the surgeon in minimally invasive spine surgeries: A systematic review of 15 studies. Arif S; Brady Z; Enchev Y; Peev N; Encheva E Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Nov; 107(7):102795. PubMed ID: 33333283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Review of Techniques, Time Demand, Radiation Exposure, and Outcomes of Skin-anchored Intraoperative 3D Navigation in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Surgery. Vaishnav AS; Merrill RK; Sandhu H; McAnany SJ; Iyer S; Gang CH; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Apr; 45(8):E465-E476. PubMed ID: 32224807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of Intraoperative Computed Tomography Improves Outcome of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Venier A; Croci D; Robert T; Distefano D; Presilla S; Scarone P World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e572-e580. PubMed ID: 33482416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Outcome and Cost Analysis Comparing Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopy versus Computed Tomography-Guided Navigation. Khanna R; McDevitt JL; Abecassis ZA; Smith ZA; Koski TR; Fessler RG; Dahdaleh NS World Neurosurg; 2016 Oct; 94():255-260. PubMed ID: 27423195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Prospective Study Reporting Intraoperative Parameters, Pedicle Screw Perforation, and Radiation Exposure in Navigation-Guided versus Non-navigated Fluoroscopy-Assisted Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Dusad T; Kundnani V; Dutta S; Patel A; Mehta G; Singh M Asian Spine J; 2018 Apr; 12(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 29713413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgeons' exposure to radiation in single- and multi-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; a prospective study. Funao H; Ishii K; Momoshima S; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Watanabe K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95233. PubMed ID: 24736321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Analysis of lumbosacral sagittal balance parameter variation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with real-time 3D navigation techniques]. Ma CR; Chen HX; Li GJ; He XY; Wang LS; Huang T; Meng ZB Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2021 Apr; 34(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 33896128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters. Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion. Lee WC; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]