247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25873631)
1. Ancestral Relationships Using Metafounders: Finite Ancestral Populations and Across Population Relationships.
Legarra A; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Aguilar I; Misztal I
Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):455-68. PubMed ID: 25873631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating genomic relationships of metafounders across and within breeds using maximum likelihood, pseudo-expectation-maximization maximum likelihood and increase of relationships.
Legarra A; Bermann M; Mei Q; Christensen OF
Genet Sel Evol; 2024 May; 56(1):35. PubMed ID: 38698347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metafounders are related to F
Garcia-Baccino CA; Legarra A; Christensen OF; Misztal I; Pocrnic I; Vitezica ZG; Cantet RJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):34. PubMed ID: 28283016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applying the Metafounders Approach for Genomic Evaluation in a Multibreed Beef Cattle Population.
Junqueira VS; Lopes PS; Lourenco D; Silva FFE; Cardoso FF
Front Genet; 2020; 11():556399. PubMed ID: 33424914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliabilities of estimated breeding values in models with metafounders.
Bermann M; Aguilar I; Lourenco D; Misztal I; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jan; 55(1):6. PubMed ID: 36690938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Redefining and interpreting genomic relationships of metafounders.
Legarra A; Bermann M; Mei Q; Christensen OF
Genet Sel Evol; 2024 May; 56(1):34. PubMed ID: 38698373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical note: Genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in a single-step approach with metafounders.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Legarra A
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1472-1480. PubMed ID: 28464109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.
Zhang Q; Calus MP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss.
VanRaden PM; Olson KM; Wiggans GR; Cole JB; Tooker ME
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Nov; 94(11):5673-82. PubMed ID: 22032391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic diversity analysis of two commercial breeds of pigs using genomic and pedigree data.
Zanella R; Peixoto JO; Cardoso FF; Cardoso LL; Biegelmeyer P; Cantão ME; Otaviano A; Freitas MS; Caetano AR; Ledur MC
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():24. PubMed ID: 27029213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recursive Algorithms for Modeling Genomic Ancestral Origins in a Fixed Pedigree.
Zheng C; Boer MP; van Eeuwijk FA
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3231-3245. PubMed ID: 30068523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of relationships between pigs based on pedigree and genomic information.
Zhang J; Song H; Zhang Q; Ding X
Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):697-705. PubMed ID: 31708004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic evaluation for three-way crossbreeding.
Christensen OF; Legarra A; Lund MS; Su G
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():98. PubMed ID: 26694257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection.
Porto-Neto LR; Barendse W; Henshall JM; McWilliam SM; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():84. PubMed ID: 26525050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative trait locus analysis of hybrid pedigrees: variance-components model, inbreeding parameter, and power.
Svischeva GR
BMC Genet; 2007 Jul; 8():50. PubMed ID: 17651509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The estimation of genomic relationships using breedwise allele frequencies among animals in multibreed populations.
Makgahlela ML; Strandén I; Nielsen US; Sillanpää MJ; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5364-75. PubMed ID: 23769355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
Wang J
Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pedigrees and microsatellites among endangered ungulates: what do they tell us?
Ruiz-López MJ; Roldán ER; Espeso G; Gomendio M
Mol Ecol; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1352-64. PubMed ID: 19368643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ancestral inbreeding reduces the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster.
Swindell WR; Bouzat JL
Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):762-7. PubMed ID: 16739457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
