These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [The physician and the malpractice accusation]. Pribilla O Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1988; 46():27-36. PubMed ID: 3178671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Expert testimony in malpractice suits]. Deutsch E Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 8588427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The surgeon as the expert in the legal liability process]. Franzki H Chirurg; 1991 Jan; 62(1):suppl 5-11. PubMed ID: 2026059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Status and function of the anesthesiologic expert witness in the malpractice process]. Ulsenheimer K Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):55-60; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Surgical treatment error and problems in its assessment from the legal viewpoint]. Binder G Zentralbl Chir; 1987; 112(22):1445-9. PubMed ID: 3439380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Status and responsibilities of the expert in malpractice procedures]. Ulsenheimer K Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 2696707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [What is the origin of medical standards (regulations regarding medical competence)?]. Wawersik J Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):43-8; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Nursing competence--exemplified by expert assessment of decubitus ulcer prevention]. Jacobs P Krankenpfl J; 2003; 41(4-6):78-83. PubMed ID: 12929311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Limits of methodological freedom in anesthesia: from the viewpoint of the legal expert]. Weissauer W Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):48-51; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Limits of methodological freedom in anesthesia: from the viewpoint of the medical expert]. Dudziak R Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):52-5; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Behavior in cases of medical damage]. Ratzel R Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):406-10. PubMed ID: 2533927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Endoscopic surgery and malpractice]. Ulsenheimer K Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1995; 257(1-4):29-36. PubMed ID: 8579409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Conflicting expert opinions from the legal viewpoint]. Pelz FJ Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):636-9. PubMed ID: 9064938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Deficient precision in medical treatment--role of the expert witness in the liability process]. Probst J Unfallchirurgie; 1986 Feb; 12(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 3962010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Liability risk of operations. Unavoidable complication or avoidable treatment error?]. Sailer R; Wienke A Chirurg; 2014 Dec; 85(12):1098-102. PubMed ID: 25351345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Medical malpractice from the physician's viewpoint]. Carstensen G Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 8588425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Conflicting expert opinions from the medical viewpoint]. Specht G Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):640-1. PubMed ID: 9064939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]