111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25875971)
1. Two Distinct Types of Linear Distribution in Nonmass Enhancement at Breast MR Imaging: Difference in Positive Predictive Value between Linear and Branching Patterns.
Machida Y; Tozaki M; Shimauchi A; Yoshida T
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):686-94. PubMed ID: 25875971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revisiting Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Analysis of Outcomes and Follow-Up Using the Updated BI-RADS Atlas.
Chikarmane SA; Michaels AY; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 28834447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver variability and likelihood of malignancy for fifth edition BI-RADS MRI descriptors in non-mass breast lesions.
Lunkiewicz M; Forte S; Freiwald B; Singer G; Leo C; Kubik-Huch RA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 31392476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions.
Williams TC; DeMartini WB; Partridge SC; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 17507720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the Accuracy of Computer-aided Diagnosis for Breast MR Imaging by Differentiating between Mass and Nonmass Lesions.
Gallego-Ortiz C; Martel AL
Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):679-88. PubMed ID: 26383229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clumped vs non-clumped internal enhancement patterns in linear non-mass enhancement on breast MRI.
Chen ST; Covelli J; Okamoto S; Daniel BL; DeMartini WB; Ikeda DM
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201166. PubMed ID: 33332980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI.
Sakamoto N; Tozaki M; Higa K; Tsunoda Y; Ogawa T; Abe S; Ozaki S; Sakamoto M; Tsuruhara T; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Yamashiro N; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18224381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morphology evaluation of nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: Effect of a three-step interpretation model for readers' performances and biopsy recommendations.
Shimauchi A; Ota H; Machida Y; Yoshida T; Satani N; Mori N; Takase K; Tozaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 26781155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening breast MR imaging: comparison of interpretation of baseline and annual follow-up studies.
Abramovici G; Mainiero MB
Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 21285337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Lee MJ; Kaplan JB; LaTrenta LR; Menell JH; Abramson AF; Dashnaw SM; Ballon DJ; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 12076929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discriminative Factors of Malignancy of Ipsilateral Nonmass Enhancement in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer on Initial Staging Breast MRI.
Jirarayapong J; Chikarmane SA; Portnow LH; Farah S; Gombos EC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 May; 59(5):1725-1739. PubMed ID: 37534882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast MR imaging screening in women with a history of breast conservation therapy.
Gweon HM; Cho N; Han W; Yi A; Moon HG; Noh DY; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 24635678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invasive breast carcinoma: influence of prognosis and patient-related factors on kinetic MR imaging characteristics.
Millet I; Curros-Doyon F; Molinari N; Bouic-Pages E; Prat X; Alili C; Taourel P
Radiology; 2014 Jan; 270(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 24029641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The MRI characteristics of non-mass enhancement lesions of the breast: associations with malignancy.
Aydin H
Br J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 92(1096):20180464. PubMed ID: 30673299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1223-30. PubMed ID: 22528918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cancellation of MR imaging-guided breast biopsy due to lesion nonvisualization: frequency and follow-up.
Brennan SB; Sung JS; Dershaw DD; Liberman L; Morris EA
Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 21852565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.
Kuhl CK; Schild HH; Morakkabati N
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):789-800. PubMed ID: 16118161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
Schnall MD; Blume J; Bluemke DA; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Thickman D; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Lehman C; Gatsonis CA
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16373758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of the enhancing lesions on dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with interstitial mammoplasty.
Kim TY; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Kim HS; Cha ES; Kim JY; Song BJ
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2205-11. PubMed ID: 24103354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
