These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Direct polymerase chain reaction detection of Campylobacter spp. in poultry hatchery samples. Hiett KL; Cox NA; Stern NJ Avian Dis; 2002; 46(1):219-23. PubMed ID: 11922339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of Campylobacter spp. in chicken rinse samples by using flotation prior to real-time PCR. Wolffs P; Norling B; Hoorfar J; Griffiths M; Rådström P Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 71(10):5759-64. PubMed ID: 16204485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken fecal samples by real-time PCR. Lund M; Nordentoft S; Pedersen K; Madsen M J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Nov; 42(11):5125-32. PubMed ID: 15528705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reverse transcriptase real-time PCR for detection and quantification of viable Campylobacter jejuni directly from poultry faecal samples. Bui XT; Wolff A; Madsen M; Bang DD Res Microbiol; 2012 Jan; 163(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 22064380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "Limits of control"--crucial parameters for a reliable quantification of viable campylobacter by real-time PCR. Krüger NJ; Buhler C; Iwobi AN; Huber I; Ellerbroek L; Appel B; Stingl K PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88108. PubMed ID: 24505398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Challenging the "gold standard" of colony-forming units - Validation of a multiplex real-time PCR for quantification of viable Campylobacter spp. in meat rinses. Stingl K; Heise J; Thieck M; Wulsten IF; Pacholewicz E; Iwobi AN; Govindaswamy J; Zeller-Péronnet V; Scheuring S; Luu HQ; Fridriksdottir V; Gölz G; Priller F; Gruntar I; Jorgensen F; Koene M; Kovac J; Lick S; Répérant E; Rohlfing A; Zawilak-Pawlik A; Rossow M; Schlierf A; Frost K; Simon K; Uhlig S; Huber I Int J Food Microbiol; 2021 Dec; 359():109417. PubMed ID: 34624596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid quantification of viable Campylobacter bacteria on chicken carcasses, using real-time PCR and propidium monoazide treatment, as a tool for quantitative risk assessment. Josefsen MH; Löfström C; Hansen TB; Christensen LS; Olsen JE; Hoorfar J Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 76(15):5097-104. PubMed ID: 20562292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Viability of Campylobacter spp. in frozen and chilled broiler carcasses according to real-time PCR with propidium monoazide pretreatment. Castro AGSA; Dorneles EMS; Santos ELS; Alves TM; Silva GR; Figueiredo TC; Assis DCS; Lage AP; Cançado SV Poult Sci; 2018 May; 97(5):1706-1711. PubMed ID: 29471351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The detection of hipO gene by real-time PCR in thermophilic Campylobacter spp. with very weak and negative reaction of hippurate hydrolysis. Caner V; Cokal Y; Cetin C; Sen A; Karagenc N Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2008 Nov; 94(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 18665452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcass rinse by real-time PCR. Botteldoorn N; Van Coillie E; Piessens V; Rasschaert G; Debruyne L; Heyndrickx M; Herman L; Messens W J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 105(6):1909-18. PubMed ID: 19016974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Bifidobacterium-based synbiotic product to reduce the transmission of C. jejuni along the poultry food chain. Baffoni L; Gaggìa F; Di Gioia D; Santini C; Mogna L; Biavati B Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 157(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 22608658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prevalence and genetic diversity of Campylobacter spp. in domestic 'backyard' poultry in Canterbury, New Zealand. Anderson J; Horn BJ; Gilpin BJ Zoonoses Public Health; 2012 Feb; 59(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 21824372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative, collaborative, and on-site validation of a TaqMan PCR method as a tool for certified production of fresh, campylobacter-free chickens. Krause M; Josefsen MH; Lund M; Jacobsen NR; Brorsen L; Moos M; Stockmarr A; Hoorfar J Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 72(8):5463-8. PubMed ID: 16885299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection and identification of Campylobacter spp. using the polymerase chain reaction. Giesendorf BA; Quint WG Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 1995 Jul; 41(5):625-38. PubMed ID: 7580843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enrichment followed by quantitative PCR both for rapid detection and as a tool for quantitative risk assessment of food-borne thermotolerant campylobacters. Josefsen MH; Jacobsen NR; Hoorfar J Appl Environ Microbiol; 2004 Jun; 70(6):3588-92. PubMed ID: 15184161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enumeration of Campylobacter spp. on the surface and within chicken breast fillets. Luber P; Bartelt E J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 17241335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monitoring Campylobacter in the poultry production chain—from culture to genes and beyond. Josefsen MH; Bhunia AK; Engvall EO; Fachmann MS; Hoorfar J J Microbiol Methods; 2015 May; 112():118-25. PubMed ID: 25771343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]