These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25877226)

  • 21. Primary care provider's acceptance of health information exchange utilizing IHE XDS.
    Haarbrandt B; Schwartze J; Gusew N; Seidel C; Kleinschmidt T; Haux R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():998. PubMed ID: 23920772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Engaging with a Wiki related to knowledge translation: a survey of WhatisKT Wiki users.
    Mathew D; McKibbon KA; Lokker C; Colquhoun H
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jan; 16(1):e21. PubMed ID: 24449712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A usability evaluation of medical software at an expert conference setting.
    Bond RR; Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Moore G; Guldenring D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014; 113(1):383-95. PubMed ID: 24210868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selection and pilot implementation of a mobile image viewer: a case study.
    Zwart CM; He M; Wu T; Demaerschalk BM; Mitchell JR; Hara AK
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2015 May; 3(2):e45. PubMed ID: 26018587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimizing the usability of mobile phones for individuals who are deaf.
    Liu CH; Chiu HP; Hsieh CL; Li RK
    Assist Technol; 2010; 22(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 20698429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A usability evaluation of a SNOMED CT based compositional interface terminology for intensive care.
    Bakhshi-Raiez F; de Keizer NF; Cornet R; Dorrepaal M; Dongelmans D; Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 May; 81(5):351-62. PubMed ID: 22030036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Usability evaluation: results from "Evaluation of mobile information technology to improve nurses' access to and use of research evidence".
    Di Pietro TL; Nguyen H; Doran DM
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Aug; 30(8):440-8. PubMed ID: 22425993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breadth of Coverage, Ease of Use, and Quality of Mobile Point-of-Care Tool Information Summaries: An Evaluation.
    Johnson E; Emani VK; Ren J
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Oct; 4(4):e117. PubMed ID: 27733328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Mobile Health Technologies for Managing Chronic Conditions in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.
    Matthew-Maich N; Harris L; Ploeg J; Markle-Reid M; Valaitis R; Ibrahim S; Gafni A; Isaacs S
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jun; 4(2):e29. PubMed ID: 27282195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Usability evaluation with mental health professionals and young people to develop an Internet-based cognitive-behaviour therapy program for adolescents with anxiety disorders.
    Wozney L; Baxter P; Newton AS
    BMC Pediatr; 2015 Dec; 15():213. PubMed ID: 26675420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measuring AT Usability with the Modified System Usability Scale (SUS).
    Friesen EL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():137-143. PubMed ID: 28873790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Disparities in mobile phone access and maternal health service utilization in Nigeria: a population-based survey.
    Jennings L; Omoni A; Akerele A; Ibrahim Y; Ekanem E
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 May; 84(5):341-8. PubMed ID: 25737460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India.
    Pal D; Vanijja V
    Child Youth Serv Rev; 2020 Dec; 119():105535. PubMed ID: 33020676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS).
    Stoyanov SR; Hides L; Kavanagh DJ; Wilson H
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jun; 4(2):e72. PubMed ID: 27287964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Usability and Workload of Access Technology for People With Severe Motor Impairment: A Comparison of Brain-Computer Interfacing and Eye Tracking.
    Pasqualotto E; Matuz T; Federici S; Ruf CA; Bartl M; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Birbaumer N; Halder S
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2015; 29(10):950-7. PubMed ID: 25753951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is Less Sometimes More? An Experimental Comparison of Four Measures of Perceived Usability.
    Gräve E; Buchner A
    Hum Factors; 2024 Mar; ():187208241237862. PubMed ID: 38482806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Primary care providers' acceptance of health information exchange utilizing IHE XDS.
    Haarbrandt B; Schwartze J; Gusew N; Seidel C; Haux R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 190():106-8. PubMed ID: 23823391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Designing a health referral mobile application for high-mobility end users in Indonesia.
    Pinem AA; Yeskafauzan A; Handayani PW; Azzahro F; Hidayanto AN; Ayuningtyas D
    Heliyon; 2020 Jan; 6(1):e03174. PubMed ID: 31938751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Usability Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Voice Assistants: The Case of Amazon Alexa.
    Zwakman DS; Pal D; Arpnikanondt C
    SN Comput Sci; 2021; 2(1):28. PubMed ID: 33458698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. User productivity as a function of AutoCAD interface design.
    Mitta DA; Flores PL
    Appl Ergon; 1995 Dec; 26(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 15677039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.