These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25877457)

  • 1. Impact of shale gas development on water resources: a case study in northern poland.
    Vandecasteele I; Marí Rivero I; Sala S; Baranzelli C; Barranco R; Batelaan O; Lavalle C
    Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1285-99. PubMed ID: 25877457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ecological risks of shale oil and gas development to wildlife, aquatic resources and their habitats.
    Brittingham MC; Maloney KO; Farag AM; Harper DD; Bowen ZH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11034-47. PubMed ID: 25188826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Habitat loss and modification due to gas development in the Fayetteville shale.
    Moran MD; Cox AB; Wells RL; Benichou CC; McClung MR
    Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1276-84. PubMed ID: 25566834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A risk assessment tool applied to the study of shale gas resources.
    Veiguela M; Hurtado A; Eguilior S; Recreo F; Roqueñi N; Loredo J
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Nov; 571():551-60. PubMed ID: 27453140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The water footprint of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas extraction in China.
    Gao J; Zou C; Zhang X; Guo W; Yu R; Ni Y; Liu D; Kang L; Liu Y; Kondash A; Vengosh A
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan; 907():168135. PubMed ID: 37890628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Synergies and Tradeoffs Among Environmental Impacts Under Conservation Planning of Shale Gas Surface Infrastructure.
    Milt AW; Gagnolet T; Armsworth PR
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 57(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 26275668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental flows in the context of unconventional natural gas development in the Marcellus Shale.
    Buchanan BP; Auerbach DA; McManamay RA; Taylor JM; Flecker AS; Archibald JA; Fuka DR; Walter MT
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jan; 27(1):37-55. PubMed ID: 28052494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydraulic "fracking": are surface water impacts an ecological concern?
    Burton GA; Basu N; Ellis BR; Kapo KE; Entrekin S; Nadelhoffer K
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1679-89. PubMed ID: 25044053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids for wells located in the Marcellus Shale Play.
    Chen H; Carter KE
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Sep; 200():312-324. PubMed ID: 28591666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of the scientific evidence to support environmental risk assessment of shale gas development in the UK.
    Prpich G; Coulon F; Anthony EJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Sep; 563-564():731-40. PubMed ID: 26627123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).
    Costa D; Jesus J; Branco D; Danko A; Fiúza A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jun; 24(17):14579-14594. PubMed ID: 28452035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drinking water while fracking: now and in the future.
    Brantley SL
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 25713828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The costs of avoiding environmental impacts from shale-gas surface infrastructure.
    Milt AW; Gagnolet TD; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 27232111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential water resource impacts of hydraulic fracturing from unconventional oil production in the Bakken shale.
    Shrestha N; Chilkoor G; Wilder J; Gadhamshetty V; Stone JJ
    Water Res; 2017 Jan; 108():1-24. PubMed ID: 27865434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Water intensity assessment of shale gas resources in the Wattenberg field in northeastern Colorado.
    Goodwin S; Carlson K; Knox K; Douglas C; Rein L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 May; 48(10):5991-5. PubMed ID: 24749865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of the Impacts of Wind Energy and Unconventional Gas Development on Land-use and Ecosystem Services: An Example from the Anadarko Basin of Oklahoma, USA.
    Davis KM; Nguyen MN; McClung MR; Moran MD
    Environ Manage; 2018 May; 61(5):796-804. PubMed ID: 29460237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The flux of radionuclides in flowback fluid from shale gas exploitation.
    Almond S; Clancy SA; Davies RJ; Worrall F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014 Nov; 21(21):12316-24. PubMed ID: 24938807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shale gas, wind and water: assessing the potential cumulative impacts of energy development on ecosystem services within the Marcellus play.
    Evans JS; Kiesecker JM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89210. PubMed ID: 24586599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observations of the release of non-methane hydrocarbons from fractured shale.
    Sommariva R; Blake RS; Cuss RJ; Cordell RL; Harrington JF; White IR; Monks PS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(15):8891-6. PubMed ID: 24978099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pennsylvania's technologically enhanced, naturally occurring radioactive material experiences and studies of the oil and gas industry.
    Allard DJ
    Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(2):178. PubMed ID: 25551500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.