These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25877709)
1. [Corneal subbasal nerve density changes after laser in situ keratomileusis with mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser]. Hu L; Xie W; Tang L; Chen J; Zhang D; Yu P; Qu J Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 51(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25877709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subbasal nerve density and corneal sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome. Patel SV; McLaren JW; Kittleson KM; Bourne WM Arch Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 128(11):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21060042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tear menisci after laser in situ keratomileusis with mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser. Xie W; Zhang D; Chen J; Liu J; Yu Y; Hu L Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Aug; 55(9):5806-12. PubMed ID: 25146992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo corneal confocal microscopy comparison of intralase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis. Sonigo B; Iordanidou V; Chong-Sit D; Auclin F; Ancel JM; Labbé A; Baudouin C Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):2803-11. PubMed ID: 16799017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fellow Eye Comparison of Nerve Fiber Regeneration After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK: A Confocal Microscopy Study. Agca A; Cankaya KI; Yilmaz I; Yildirim Y; Yasa D; Olcucu O; Demircan A; Demirok A; Yilmaz OF J Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 31(9):594-8. PubMed ID: 26352564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis of flap thickness by anterior segment optical coherence tomography in different flap preparation styles of excimer laser surgery]. Yu ZQ; Xu Y; Yao PJ; Qin B; Zhou XT; Chu RY Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 46(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 20450663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation. Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraocular straylight after thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome. Wang Y; Li J; Liu Y; Xie L J Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 29(8):534-9. PubMed ID: 23909780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of posterior vitreous detachment after femtosecond laser and microkeratome-assisted lase in situ keratomileusis]. Wang TT; Wang Y; Zhao SZ Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 49(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 23900089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Femtosecond lenticule extraction for correction of myopia: clinical results and recovery of subbasal nerves]. Yu Y; Cheng XL; Gu LQ; Jing GJ; Chen H Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 52(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 26979117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of cornea flap made by femtosecond laser and microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis]. Lian JC; Zhang SS; Zhang J; Ye S Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 49(4):305-8. PubMed ID: 23900088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome. Lin MY; Chang DC; Hsu WM; Wang IJ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):992-9. PubMed ID: 22624898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confocal comparison of corneal nerve regeneration and keratocyte reaction between FS-LASIK, OUP-SBK, and conventional LASIK. Zhang F; Deng S; Guo N; Wang M; Sun X Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5536-44. PubMed ID: 22786909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of corneal flap thickness predictability and architecture between femtosecond laser and sub-Bowman keratomileusis microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis. Rattan SA; Rashid RF; Mutashar MK; Nasser YAR; Anwar DS Int Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 43(5):1553-1558. PubMed ID: 36307607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subbasal nerve fiber regeneration after LASIK and LASEK assessed by noncontact esthesiometry and in vivo confocal microscopy: prospective study. Darwish T; Brahma A; O'Donnell C; Efron N J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1515-21. PubMed ID: 17720064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis. Lim T; Yang S; Kim M; Tchah H Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 May; 141(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 16678504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early corneal nerve damage and recovery following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Mohamed-Noriega K; Riau AK; Lwin NC; Chaurasia SS; Tan DT; Mehta JS Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1823-34. PubMed ID: 24569584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser. Kim CY; Song JH; Na KS; Chung SH; Joo CK Korean J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21350688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]