These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25878679)

  • 1. Histological assessment of pulpal responses to resin modified glass ionomer cements in human teeth.
    Eskandarizadeh A; Parizi MT; Goroohi H; Badrian H; Asadi A; Khalighinejad N
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 25878679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reactionary dentinogenesis after applying restorative materials and bioactive dentin matrix molecules as liners in deep cavities prepared in nonhuman primate teeth.
    Duque C; Hebling J; Smith AJ; Giro EM; Oliveira MF; de Souza Costa CA
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):452-61. PubMed ID: 16671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term evaluation of the pulpo-dentin complex response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a bonding agent applied in deep cavities.
    Costa CA; Giro EM; do Nascimento AB; Teixeira HM; Hebling J
    Dent Mater; 2003 Dec; 19(8):739-46. PubMed ID: 14511732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human pulp response to conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements applied in very deep cavities.
    Ribeiro APD; Sacono NT; Soares DG; Bordini EAF; de Souza Costa CA; Hebling J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May; 24(5):1739-1748. PubMed ID: 31372829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restorative pulpal and repair responses.
    Murray PE; About I; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Apr; 132(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 11315379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pulp response after application of two resin modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) in deep cavities of prepared human teeth.
    Costa CA; Ribeiro AP; Giro EM; Randall RC; Hebling J
    Dent Mater; 2011 Jul; 27(7):e158-70. PubMed ID: 21549419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histopathology study on pulp response to glass ionomers in human teeth.
    Mousavinasab M; Namazikhah MS; Sarabi N; Jajarm HH; Bidar M; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Jan; 36(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18293762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study to evaluate the Efficacy of Resin-modified Glass lonomer Cement Liner as a Direct Pulp Capping Material.
    Shameem A; Muliyar S; Thankachan RP; Kalliath JT; Mangalath U; Mangalath S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1065-1071. PubMed ID: 30287705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps.
    Tarim B; Hafez AA; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):535-42. PubMed ID: 9807135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biocompatibility of a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement applied in very deep cavities prepared in human teeth.
    Soares DG; Basso FG; Scheffel DL; Giro EM; de Souza Costa CA; Hebling J
    Gen Dent; 2016; 64(4):33-40. PubMed ID: 27367631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping.
    Murray PE; Hafez AA; Smith AJ; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 12674361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cavity remaining dentin thickness and pulpal activity.
    Murray PE; About I; Lumley PJ; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 12074229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulpal response to a hybrid composite resin inlay bonded with a newly developed resin-modified glass ionomer luting cement.
    Uzzaman MA; Shimada Y; Seki Y; Tagami J
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Jun; 24(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 16022436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.