These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25879243)
1. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients. Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and nonlinear frequency compression for children with cookie-bite audiometric configurations. John A; Wolfe J; Scollie S; Schafer E; Hudson M; Woods W; Wheeler J; Hudgens K; Neumann S J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):1022-33. PubMed ID: 25514454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users. Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss. Wolfe J; John A; Schafer E; Nyffeler M; Boretzki M; Caraway T J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):618-28. PubMed ID: 21376003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of frequency compression hearing aids for unilaterally implanted children with acoustically amplified residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear. Park LR; Teagle HF; Buss E; Roush PA; Buchman CA Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e1-e12. PubMed ID: 22531574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing). Potts LG; Skinner MW; Litovsky RA; Strube MJ; Kuk F J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):353-73. PubMed ID: 19594084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid. Hua H; Johansson B; Jönsson R; Magnusson L J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):722-32. PubMed ID: 23072964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users. Neuman AC; Zeman A; Neukam J; Wang B; Svirsky MA Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Results in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With Varied Asymmetric Hearing: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Speech Recognition, Localization, and Participant Report. Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Dwyer NY; Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):845-862. PubMed ID: 29373326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing. Chang YP; Chang RY; Lin CY; Luo X Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 26752089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants. Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymmetric Hearing Loss in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: Results and Recommendations From a Multisite Prospective Clinical Trial. Firszt JB; Holden LK; Dwyer NY; Reeder RM; Strube MJ; Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1140-1156. PubMed ID: 37018114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients. English R; Plant K; Maciejczyk M; Cowan R Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S45-50. PubMed ID: 26853233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression and Digital Noise Reduction on Word Recognition and Satisfaction Ratings in Noise in Adult Hearing Aid Users. Plyler PN; Tardy B; Hedrick M J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):103-114. PubMed ID: 30461384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing. McDermott H; Henshall K J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):380-9. PubMed ID: 20701835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss. Firszt JB; Holden LK; Reeder RM; Cowdrey L; King S Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 22441359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of aided hearing in the nonimplanted ear on bimodal hearing. Jang JH; Lee JH; Chang SO; Oh SH Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e270-6. PubMed ID: 25153664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Phoneme Perception Test Method for High-Frequency Hearing Aid Fitting. Schmitt N; Winkler A; Boretzki M; Holube I J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 May; 27(5):367-379. PubMed ID: 27179256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]