These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25879267)

  • 1. Wounds measured from digital photographs using photodigital planimetry software: validation and rater reliability.
    Wendelken ME; Berg WT; Lichtenstein P; Markowitz L; Comfort C; Alvarez OM
    Wounds; 2011 Sep; 23(9):267-75. PubMed ID: 25879267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.
    Gethin G; Cowman S
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 16553755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A comparison of digital planimetry and transparency tracing based methods for measuring diabetic cutaneous ulcer surface area].
    Wang Y; Liu G; Yuan N; Ran X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 22(5):563-6. PubMed ID: 18630436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and measurement error of digital planimetry for the measurement of chronic venous leg ulcers.
    Stacey MC; Phillips SA; Farrokhyar F; Swaine JM
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep; 25(5):901-905. PubMed ID: 28922511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D photography is as accurate as digital planimetry tracing in determining burn wound area.
    Stockton KA; McMillan CM; Storey KJ; David MC; Kimble RM
    Burns; 2015 Feb; 41(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 24877886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity and Reliability of Two Digital Wound Measurement Tools after Surgery in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa.
    Aarts P; van Huijstee JC; Ragamin A; Reeves JL; van Montfrans C; van der Zee HH; Prens EP
    Dermatology; 2023; 239(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 35998557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ImageJ: A Free, Easy, and Reliable Method to Measure Leg Ulcers Using Digital Pictures.
    Aragón-Sánchez J; Quintana-Marrero Y; Aragón-Hernández C; Hernández-Herero MJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2017 Dec; 16(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 29251541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
    Foltynski P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional digital imaging is as accurate and reliable to measure leg ulcer area as transparent tracing with digital planimetry.
    Chaby G; Lok C; Thirion JP; Lucien A; Senet P
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2017 Nov; 5(6):837-843. PubMed ID: 29037356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring the size of ulcers by planimetry: a useful method in the clinical setting.
    Oien RF; Håkansson A; Hansen BU; Bjellerup M
    J Wound Care; 2002 May; 11(5):165-8. PubMed ID: 12055939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of 3 wound measurement techniques: effects of pressure ulcer size and shape.
    Bilgin M; Güneş UY
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(6):590-3. PubMed ID: 24202222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Digital Planimetry and Ruler Methods for the Measurement of Extraction Socket Wounds.
    Ibraheem WI; Bhati AK; Hakami NA; Alshehri AD; Wadani MHM; Ageeli FME
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jan; 59(1):. PubMed ID: 36676759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds.
    Thompson N; Gordey L; Bowles H; Parslow N; Houghton P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Aug; 26(8):360-73. PubMed ID: 23860221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
    Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wound Area Measurement with Digital Planimetry: Improved Accuracy and Precision with Calibration Based on 2 Rulers.
    Foltynski P; Ladyzynski P; Ciechanowska A; Migalska-Musial K; Judzewicz G; Sabalinska S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134622. PubMed ID: 26252747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
    Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wound measurement: the comparative reliability of direct versus photographic tracings analyzed by planimetry versus digitizing techniques.
    Lagan KM; Dusoir AE; McDonough SM; Baxter GD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Aug; 81(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 10943763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A practical method for the estimation of vitiligo surface area: a comparison between the point counting and digital planimetry techniques.
    Aydin F; Senturk N; Sahin B; Bek Y; Yuksel EP; Turanli AY
    Eur J Dermatol; 2007; 17(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 17324824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.