BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25879638)

  • 1. Overt vs. covert speed cameras in combination with delayed vs. immediate feedback to the offender.
    Marciano H; Setter P; Norman J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jun; 79():231-40. PubMed ID: 25879638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speeding drivers' attitudes and perceptions of speed cameras in rural England.
    Blincoe KM; Jones AP; Sauerzapf V; Haynes R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):371-8. PubMed ID: 16309618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of automated speed enforcement in Montgomery County, Maryland, on vehicle speeds, public opinion, and crashes.
    Hu W; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():53-8. PubMed ID: 27586103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drivers' behavioral responses to combined speed and red light cameras.
    Polders E; Cornu J; De Ceunynck T; Daniels S; Brijs K; Brijs T; Hermans E; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():153-66. PubMed ID: 25988809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overall impact of speed-related initiatives and factors on crash outcomes.
    D'Elia A; Newstead S; Cameron M
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2007; 51():465-84. PubMed ID: 18184508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioural effects of fixed speed cameras on motorways: overall improved speed compliance or kangaroo jumps?
    De Pauw E; Daniels S; Brijs T; Hermans E; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Dec; 73():132-40. PubMed ID: 25217731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should traffic enforcement be unpredictable? The case of red light cameras in Edmonton.
    Tay R; de Barros A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):955-61. PubMed ID: 21376888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survey about pedestrian safety and attitudes toward automated traffic enforcement in Washington, D.C.
    Cicchino JB; Wells JK; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(4):414-23. PubMed ID: 24471367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do speed cameras reduce speeding in urban areas?
    Oliveira DF; Friche AA; Costa DA; Mingoti SA; Caiaffa WT;
    Cad Saude Publica; 2015 Nov; 31 Suppl 1():208-18. PubMed ID: 26648375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of automated photo enforcement of vehicle speed in school zones: interrupted time series analysis.
    Quistberg DA; Thompson LL; Curtin J; Rivara FP; Ebel BE
    Inj Prev; 2019 Oct; 25(5):400-406. PubMed ID: 30279165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driver views on speed and enforcement.
    Schechtman E; Bar-Gera H; Musicant O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Apr; 89():9-21. PubMed ID: 26773696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the effect of fixed speed cameras on speeding behavior among Iranian taxi drivers through telematics monitoring.
    Tavolinejad H; Malekpour MR; Rezaei N; Jafari A; Ahmadi N; Nematollahi A; Abdolhamidi E; Foroutan Mehr E; Hasan M; Farzadfar F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(7):559-563. PubMed ID: 34424783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impacts of speed cameras on road accidents: an application of propensity score matching methods.
    Li H; Graham DJ; Majumdar A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():148-57. PubMed ID: 24056286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lowering thresholds for speed limit enforcement impairs peripheral object detection and increases driver subjective workload.
    Bowden VK; Loft S; Tatasciore M; Visser TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jan; 98():118-122. PubMed ID: 27716493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A causal analysis of time-varying speed camera safety effects based on the propensity score method.
    Li H; Zhang Y; Ren G
    J Safety Res; 2020 Dec; 75():119-127. PubMed ID: 33334468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evaluation of decorated camera housings - A driving simulator study.
    Ross V; Dehman A; Reinolsmann N; Do Duc NK; Van Vlierden K; Ectors W; Mollu K; Schoutteet V; Brijs T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107089. PubMed ID: 37182426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of automated speed enforcement in Montgomery County, Maryland.
    Retting RA; Farmer CM; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Oct; 9(5):440-5. PubMed ID: 18836954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are speed enforcement cameras more effective than other speed management measures? An evaluation of the relationship between speed and accident reductions.
    Hirst WM; Mountain LJ; Maher MJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Jul; 37(4):731-41. PubMed ID: 15876417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of automated speed enforcement on Loop 101 freeway in Scottsdale, Arizona.
    Retting RA; Kyrychenko SY; McCartt AT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1506-12. PubMed ID: 18606284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Traffic calming along rural highways crossing small urban communities: driving simulator experiment.
    Galante F; Mauriello F; Montella A; Pernetti M; Aria M; D'Ambrosio A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1585-94. PubMed ID: 20728607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.