58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25879862)
21. Orbital exenteration: a 10-year experience of a general oncology hospital.
Soysal HG
Orbit; 2010 Jun; 29(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 20497078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pattern of orbital exenteration at a tertiary eye care centre in North India.
Kaur A; Khattri M; Jaiswal V
Nepal J Ophthalmol; 2012; 4(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 22343999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intra-observer and inter-observer variation of Hertel exophthalmometry.
Lam AK; Lam CF; Leung WK; Hung PK
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jul; 29(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 19523092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Inter-observer agreement in clinical optic disc measurement using a modified 60 D lens.
Haslett RS; Batterbury M; Cuypers M; Cooper RL
Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 5)():692-7. PubMed ID: 9474320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Orbital exenteration for secondary orbital tumors: a series of seven cases.
Lin HF; Lui CC; Hsu HC; Lin SA
Chang Gung Med J; 2002 Sep; 25(9):599-605. PubMed ID: 12479621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain.
Perneros G; Tropp H
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):486-98. PubMed ID: 19398217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Agreement among optometrists and ophthalmologists in estimating limbal anterior chamber depth using the van Herick method.
Jindal A; Myint J; Edgar DF; Nolan WP; Lawrenson JG
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 25684241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cavity dressings in orbital exenteration wounds.
Cooper J
J Wound Care; 2012 May; 21(5):235. PubMed ID: 22696787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Orbital exenteration in periorbital malignancies.
Roche P; Timon C
Surgeon; 2012 Aug; 10(4):189-93. PubMed ID: 22818275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Knowledge of chronology of optic disc stereophotographs influences the determination of glaucomatous change.
Altangerel U; Bayer A; Henderer JD; Katz LJ; Steinmann WC; Spaeth GL
Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15629818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for grading pelvic organ prolapse according to the International Continence Society classification: which line should be used?
Fauconnier A; Zareski E; Abichedid J; Bader G; Falissard B; Fritel X
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 17696158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Novel Use of Porcine Urinary Bladder Matrix in the Exenterated Socket.
Wilson CW; Fisher MT; Pagedar NA; Kass G; Terry WW; Shriver EM
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019; 35(5):e122-e124. PubMed ID: 31503171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Influence of Clinical Experience and Photographic Presentation on Age Assessment of Women.
Nielsen BR; Linneberg A; Christensen K; Forman JL; Schwarz P
Gerontology; 2016; 62(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 26382945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Orbital exenteration. Algorithm for therapy and rehabilitation].
Keutel C; Hoffmann J; Besch D; Reinert S
Ophthalmologe; 2011 Nov; 108(11):1023-6. PubMed ID: 22090089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An assessment of clinical wound evaluation scales.
Quinn JV; Wells GA
Acad Emerg Med; 1998 Jun; 5(6):583-6. PubMed ID: 9660284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Grading reliability of the tear film viscosity examination.
Lai HY; Fang PC; Chen A; Kuo MT
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Aug; 259(8):2287-2294. PubMed ID: 33893867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Wound Shape Measuring and Monitoring System.
Langemo D; Spahn J; Snodgrass L
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2015 Jul; 28(7):317-23. PubMed ID: 26080018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Short communication: Design and validation of a hygiene score for calves.
Kellermann LM; Rieger A; Knubben-Schweizer G; Metzner M
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Apr; 103(4):3622-3627. PubMed ID: 32037176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is single observer identification of wound infection a reliable endpoint?
Greenwald PW; Schaible DD; Ruzich JV; Prince SJ; Birnbaum AJ; Bijur PE
J Emerg Med; 2002 Nov; 23(4):333-5. PubMed ID: 12480009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sample size requirements for the comparison of two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement.
Donner A
Stat Med; 1998 May; 17(10):1157-68. PubMed ID: 9618775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
