1367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25880246)
1. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.
Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA
BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform.
Fouhy F; Clooney AG; Stanton C; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 27342980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of storage buffer, DNA extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis.
Hallmaier-Wacker LK; Lueert S; Roos C; Knauf S
Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):6292. PubMed ID: 29674641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of DNA Polymerase and Number of Rounds of Amplification in PCR on 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Data.
Sze MA; Schloss PD
mSphere; 2019 May; 4(3):. PubMed ID: 31118299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies.
Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Species-level bacterial community profiling of the healthy sinonasal microbiome using Pacific Biosciences sequencing of full-length 16S rRNA genes.
Earl JP; Adappa ND; Krol J; Bhat AS; Balashov S; Ehrlich RL; Palmer JN; Workman AD; Blasetti M; Sen B; Hammond J; Cohen NA; Ehrlich GD; Mell JC
Microbiome; 2018 Oct; 6(1):190. PubMed ID: 30352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel ultra high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing library preparation method for the Illumina HiSeq platform.
de Muinck EJ; Trosvik P; Gilfillan GD; Hov JR; Sundaram AYM
Microbiome; 2017 Jul; 5(1):68. PubMed ID: 28683838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Biases on community structure during DNA extraction of shrimp intestinal microbiota revealed by high-throughput sequencing].
Wen C; He Y; Xue M; Liang H; Dong J
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2016 Jan; 56(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 27305787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved DNA Extraction and Amplification Strategy for 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon-Based Microbiome Studies.
Hong BY; Driscoll M; Gratalo D; Jarvie T; Weinstock GM
Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Mar; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 38474213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. rpoB, a promising marker for analyzing the diversity of bacterial communities by amplicon sequencing.
Ogier JC; Pagès S; Galan M; Barret M; Gaudriault S
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):171. PubMed ID: 31357928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbial profiling of cpn60 universal target sequences in artificial mixtures of vaginal bacteria sampled by nylon swabs or self-sampling devices under different storage conditions.
Schellenberg JJ; Oh AY; Hill JE
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 May; 136():57-64. PubMed ID: 28285169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA extraction for streamlined metagenomics of diverse environmental samples.
Marotz C; Amir A; Humphrey G; Gaffney J; Gogul G; Knight R
Biotechniques; 2017 Jun; 62(6):290-293. PubMed ID: 28625159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing 16S rRNA gene profile analysis from low biomass nasopharyngeal and induced sputum specimens.
Claassen-Weitz S; Gardner-Lubbe S; Mwaikono KS; du Toit E; Zar HJ; Nicol MP
BMC Microbiol; 2020 May; 20(1):113. PubMed ID: 32397992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an Analysis Pipeline Characterizing Multiple Hypervariable Regions of 16S rRNA Using Mock Samples.
Barb JJ; Oler AJ; Kim HS; Chalmers N; Wallen GR; Cashion A; Munson PJ; Ames NJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148047. PubMed ID: 26829716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of DNA extraction and PCR product purification methods for cervicovaginal microbiome analysis using cpn60 microbial profiling.
Shvartsman E; Richmond MEI; Schellenberg JJ; Lamont A; Perciani C; Russell JNH; Poliquin V; Burgener A; Jaoko W; Sandstrom P; MacDonald KS
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262355. PubMed ID: 35025956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of metagenomic DNA extraction procedures on the identifiable endophytic bacterial diversity in Sorghum bicolor (L. Moench).
Maropola MK; Ramond JB; Trindade M
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 May; 112():104-17. PubMed ID: 25775938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pipeline for amplifying and analyzing amplicons of the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene.
Allen HK; Bayles DO; Looft T; Trachsel J; Bass BE; Alt DP; Bearson SM; Nicholson T; Casey TA
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Aug; 9():380. PubMed ID: 27485508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
