248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25880538)
1. Minimal access versus open spinal surgery in treating painful spine metastasis: a systematic review.
Yang Z; Yang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang Z; Chen Y; Shen Y; Han L; Xu D; Sun H
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():68. PubMed ID: 25880538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analysis of decision making and treatment in thoracolumbar metastases.
Polly DW; Chou D; Sembrano JN; Ledonio CG; Tomita K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22 Suppl):S118-27. PubMed ID: 19829271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Potential of Minimally Invasive Surgery to Treat Metastatic Spinal Disease versus Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lu VM; Alvi MA; Goyal A; Kerezoudis P; Bydon M
World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():e859-e868. PubMed ID: 29408300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 10-Year Trends in the Surgical Management of Patients with Spinal Metastases: A Scoping Review.
Orenday-Barraza JM; Cavagnaro MJ; Avila MJ; Strouse IM; Dowell A; Kisana H; Khan N; Ravinsky R; Baaj AA
World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():170-186.e3. PubMed ID: 34655822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery for Patients With Spinal Metastasis: A Prospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Hansen-Algenstaedt N; Kwan MK; Algenstaedt P; Chiu CK; Viezens L; Chan TS; Lee CK; Wellbrock J; Chan CYW; Schaefer C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 May; 42(10):789-797. PubMed ID: 27584676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When Less Is More: The indications for MIS Techniques and Separation Surgery in Metastatic Spine Disease.
Zuckerman SL; Laufer I; Sahgal A; Yamada YJ; Schmidt MH; Chou D; Shin JH; Kumar N; Sciubba DM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Oct; 41 Suppl 20(Suppl 20):S246-S253. PubMed ID: 27753784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for metastatic spine disease: what are the options, indications, and outcomes?
Gerszten PC; Mendel E; Yamada Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22 Suppl):S78-92. PubMed ID: 19829280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with standard open surgery for vertebral thoracic metastases causing acute myelopathy in patients with short- or mid-term life expectancy: surgical technique and early clinical results.
Miscusi M; Polli FM; Forcato S; Ricciardi L; Frati A; Cimatti M; De Martino L; Ramieri A; Raco A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 25723122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases.
Hikata T; Isogai N; Shiono Y; Funao H; Okada E; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Watanabe K; Tsuji T; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Ishii K
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1082-E1087. PubMed ID: 27841799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postoperative quality-of-life assessment in patients with spine metastases treated with long-segment pedicle-screw fixation.
Bernard F; Lemée JM; Lucas O; Menei P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):725-735. PubMed ID: 28338450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Posterior-Only Approach for Lumbar Circumferential Decompression and Stabilization to Treat Spine Metastasis--Technical Report.
Donnelly DJ; Abd-El-Barr MM; Lu Y
World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 26100166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive versus conventional spine surgery for vertebral metastases: a systematic review of the evidence.
Pennington Z; Ahmed AK; Molina CA; Ehresman J; Laufer I; Sciubba DM
Ann Transl Med; 2018 Mar; 6(6):103. PubMed ID: 29707552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Percutaneous techniques in the treatment of spine tumors: what are the diagnostic and therapeutic indications and outcomes?
Mendel E; Bourekas E; Gerszten P; Golan JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22 Suppl):S93-100. PubMed ID: 19829281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic factors in patients with spinal metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Luksanapruksa P; Buchowski JM; Hotchkiss W; Tongsai S; Wilartratsami S; Chotivichit A
Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):689-708. PubMed ID: 27988342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Percutaneous vertebroplasty and open vertebroplasty for metastatic spinal tumor].
Zhao XJ; Qi XS; Mao ZX; Wang QM; Gao XB; Zhang XJ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Feb; 30(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 29350000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of mini-open anterior corpectomy and posterior total en bloc spondylectomy for solitary metastases of the thoracolumbar spine.
Fang T; Dong J; Zhou X; McGuire RA; Li X
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Oct; 17(4):271-9. PubMed ID: 22881038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Posterior decompression and spine stabilization for metastatic spinal cord compression in the cervical spine. A matched pair analysis.
Lei M; Liu Y; Yan L; Tang C; Liu S; Zhou S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1691-8. PubMed ID: 26603676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative survival and functional outcomes for patients with metastatic gynecological cancer to the spine: case series and review of the literature.
Liu A; Sankey EW; Goodwin CR; Kosztowski TA; Elder BD; Bydon A; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Sciubba DM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 26360144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical management of primary and metastatic sarcoma of the mobile spine.
Rao G; Suki D; Chakrabarti I; Feiz-Erfan I; Mody MG; McCutcheon IE; Gokaslan Z; Patel S; Rhines LD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Aug; 9(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 18764743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
