These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25880564)

  • 1. Industry sponsorship and publication bias among animal studies evaluating the effects of statins on atherosclerosis and bone outcomes: a meta-analysis.
    Anglemyer AT; Krauth D; Bero L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Mar; 15():12. PubMed ID: 25880564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonindustry-sponsored preclinical studies on statins yield greater efficacy estimates than industry-sponsored studies: a meta-analysis.
    Krauth D; Anglemyer A; Philipps R; Bero L
    PLoS Biol; 2014 Jan; 12(1):e1001770. PubMed ID: 24465178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between study sponsorship, risks of bias, and research outcomes in atrazine exposure studies conducted in non-human animals: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bero L; Anglemyer A; Vesterinen H; Krauth D
    Environ Int; 2016; 92-93():597-604. PubMed ID: 26694022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Industry sponsorship and research outcome.
    Lundh A; Sismondo S; Lexchin J; Busuioc OA; Bero L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Dec; 12():MR000033. PubMed ID: 23235689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some salt with your statin, professor?
    Macleod M
    PLoS Biol; 2014 Jan; 12(1):e1001768. PubMed ID: 24465176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Industry sponsorship and research outcome.
    Lundh A; Lexchin J; Mintzes B; Schroll JB; Bero L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 2(2):MR000033. PubMed ID: 28207928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Industry sponsorship bias in research findings: a network meta-analysis of LDL cholesterol reduction in randomised trials of statins.
    Naci H; Dias S; Ades AE
    BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g5741. PubMed ID: 25281681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than others.
    Bero L; Oostvogel F; Bacchetti P; Lee K
    PLoS Med; 2007 Jun; 4(6):e184. PubMed ID: 17550302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical controversies in clinical research: publication bias evaluations are not routinely conducted in clinical oncology systematic reviews.
    Herrmann D; Sinnett P; Holmes J; Khan S; Koller C; Vassar M
    Ann Oncol; 2017 May; 28(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28039176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research.
    Brown A; Kraft D; Schmitz SM; Sharpless V; Martin C; Shah R; Shaheen NJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Dec; 4(12):1445-51. PubMed ID: 17101295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When are statins cost-effective in cardiovascular prevention? A systematic review of sponsorship bias and conclusions in economic evaluations of statins.
    Catalá-López F; Sanfélix-Gimeno G; Ridao M; Peiró S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69462. PubMed ID: 23861972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P; Dorotka R
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bias in animal studies of estrogen effects on cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Friis Berntsen C; Rootwelt P; Dahm AEA
    Res Pract Thromb Haemost; 2021 May; 5(4):e12507. PubMed ID: 34013151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Relationship between Risk of Bias Criteria, Research Outcomes, and Study Sponsorship in a Cohort of Preclinical Thiazolidinedione Animal Studies: A Meta-Analysis.
    Abdel-Sattar M; Krauth D; Anglemyer A; Bero L
    Evid Based Preclin Med; 2014 Apr; 1(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 25642330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there evidence for biased reporting of published adverse effects data in pharmaceutical industry-funded studies?
    Golder S; Loke YK
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 66(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 18754841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
    Saveleva E; Selinski S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating solutions to sponsorship bias.
    Doucet M; Sismondo S
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Aug; 34(8):627-30. PubMed ID: 18667655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Industry sponsorship in trials on fluoride varnish or gels for caries prevention.
    Reda S; Elhennawy K; Meyer-Lückel H; Paris S; Schwendicke F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 45(4):289-295. PubMed ID: 28169445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.