275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25881088)
1. Comparative analysis of cell morphology in sputum samples homogenized with dithiothreitol, N-acetyl-L cysteine, Cytorich(®) red preservative and in cellblock preparations to enhance the sensitivity of sputum cytology for the diagnosis of lung cancer.
Saraswathy Veena V; Sara George P; Jayasree K; Sujathan K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Jul; 43(7):551-8. PubMed ID: 25881088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity of sputum cytology after homogenization with dithiothreitol in lung cancer detection. Two years of experience.
Tang CS; Tang CM; Lau YY; Kung IT
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(6):1137-40. PubMed ID: 7483988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Homogenization of sputum with dithiothreitol for early diagnosis of pulmonary malignancies.
Tang CS; Kung IT
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(5):689-93. PubMed ID: 8362579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the Morning Sputum Sample Superior to the Fresh Sputum Sample for the Detection of Malignant Cells?
Uke MS; Pathuthara S; Shaikh A; Kumar R; Kane S
Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(3):223-229. PubMed ID: 28535501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dithiothreitol homogenization of prefixed sputum for lung cancer detection.
Tang CS; Tang CM; Kung IT
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 10(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 8005048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical application of the liquid-based cytological test in cytological screening of sputum for the diagnosis of lung cancer.
Wu GP; Wang EH; Li JH; Fu ZM; Han S
Respirology; 2009 Jan; 14(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 19144056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-rater agreement of sputum cytology for lung cancer screening in Japan.
Endo C; Nakashima R; Taguchi A; Yahata K; Kawahara E; Shimagaki N; Kamio J; Saito Y; Ikeda N; Sato M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Jul; 43(7):545-50. PubMed ID: 25645403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated 3-dimensional morphologic analysis of sputum specimens for lung cancer detection: Performance characteristics support use in lung cancer screening.
Wilbur DC; Meyer MG; Presley C; Aye RW; Zarogoulidis P; Johnson DW; Peled N; Nelson AC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Sep; 123(9):548-56. PubMed ID: 26153135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel method of sputum processing for cytologic diagnosis of lung cancer.
Wang GS; Lee YC; Perng RP
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2004 Jun; 26(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 15218687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preparation of DNA from cytological material: effects of fixation, staining, and mounting medium on DNA yield and quality.
Dejmek A; Zendehrokh N; Tomaszewska M; Edsjö A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Jul; 121(7):344-53. PubMed ID: 23408720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safe separation of sputum cells from mucoid glycoprotein.
Tockman MS; Qiao Y; Li L; Zhao GZ; Sharma R; Cavenaugh LL; Erozan YS
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(6):1128-36. PubMed ID: 7483987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of sputum cytology screening for lung cancer with different positive criteria].
Jiang Y; Jin P; Chang RS; Yao SX; Zhou QH; Fan YG; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jul; 45(7):605-8. PubMed ID: 22041563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sputum cytology for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Comparison of smear and modified cell block methods.
Erkiliç S; Ozsaraç C; Küllü S
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(6):1023-7. PubMed ID: 14674072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increase of sensitivity of sputum cytology using high-resolution image cytometry: field study results.
Palcic B; Garner DM; Beveridge J; Sun XR; Doudkine A; MacAulay C; Lam S; Payne PW
Cytometry; 2002 Jun; 50(3):168-76. PubMed ID: 12116340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of cell block to detect malignancy in fluid cytology: Adjunct or necessity?
Dey S; Nag D; Nandi A; Bandyopadhyay R
J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(3):425-429. PubMed ID: 28862203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-invasive early detection of malignant pulmonary nodules by FISH-based sputum test.
Shlomi D; Peled N; Schwarz YA; Soo Hoo GW; Batra RK; Fink G; Kaplan T; Cohen L; Mollan S; Burfeind WR
Cancer Genet; 2018 Oct; 226-227():1-10. PubMed ID: 30005848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of sputum cytology using ThinPrep method for evaluation of lung cancer.
Choi YD; Han CW; Kim JH; Oh IJ; Lee JS; Nam JH; Juhng SW; Park CS
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Mar; 36(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 18232006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Cell-CT 3-dimensional cell imaging technology platform enables the detection of lung cancer using the noninvasive LuCED sputum test.
Meyer MG; Hayenga JW; Neumann T; Katdare R; Presley C; Steinhauer DE; Bell TM; Lancaster CA; Nelson AC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Sep; 123(9):512-23. PubMed ID: 26148817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Saccomanno smear slides and Megafunnel slides for sputum specimens. A comparison.
Michels R; Davidson L; Timm SS; Rieniets E; Conwell K; Saccomanno G; Wiest J; Anderson M
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1774-80. PubMed ID: 9390140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in cell-free DNA supernatant of bronchial washings and brushings.
Kawahara A; Fukumitsu C; Taira T; Abe H; Takase Y; Murata K; Yamaguchi T; Azuma K; Ishii H; Takamori S; Akiba J; Hoshino T; Kage M
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Oct; 123(10):620-8. PubMed ID: 26235264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
