BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25881342)

  • 1. Comparing different ultrasound imaging methods for breast cancer detection.
    Ozmen N; Dapp R; Zapf M; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV; van Dongen KW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Apr; 62(4):637-46. PubMed ID: 25881342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to optimize breast ultrasound.
    Athanasiou A; Tardivon A; Ollivier L; Thibault F; El Khoury C; Neuenschwander S
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18818037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
    Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the contrast of breast cancer masses in ultrasound using an autoregressive model based filter.
    von Lavante E; Noble JA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):153-60. PubMed ID: 18051054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synthetic aperture imaging in breast ultrasound: a preliminary clinical study.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Kim C; Park J; Yoo Y; Moon WK; Cho N; Choi BI
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):923-9. PubMed ID: 22633005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: first results with the Computed Ultrasound Risk Evaluation (CURE) prototype.
    Duric N; Littrup P; Poulo L; Babkin A; Pevzner R; Holsapple E; Rama O; Glide C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):773-85. PubMed ID: 17388195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel approach to evaluating breast density utilizing ultrasound tomography.
    Glide C; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):744-53. PubMed ID: 17388192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical-space refraction-corrected transmission ultrasound computed tomography made computationally practical.
    Li S; Mueller K; Jackowski M; Dione D; Staib L
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):280-8. PubMed ID: 18982616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic detection of regions of interest in breast ultrasound images based on local phase information.
    Wang X; Guo Y; Wang Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1265-73. PubMed ID: 26405886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
    Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results.
    Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An improved automatic time-of-flight picker for medical ultrasound tomography.
    Li C; Huang L; Duric N; Zhang H; Rowe C
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Jan; 49(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18620723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
    Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of spiculation on ultrasound lesions.
    Huang SF; Chang RF; Chen DR; Moon WK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jan; 23(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 14719692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CAD in questions/answers Review of the literature.
    Boyer B; Balleyguier C; Granat O; Pharaboz C
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 18977103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images.
    Moon WK; Shen YW; Huang CS; Chiang LR; Chang RF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):539-48. PubMed ID: 21420580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
    Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of a novel segmentation algorithm on radiologists' diagnosis of breast masses using ultrasound imaging.
    Tian JW; Ning CP; Guo YH; Cheng HD; Tang XL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 22104530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.