BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25881794)

  • 1. Scheduling the Stork: Media Portrayals of Women's and Physicians' Reasons for Elective Cesarean Delivery.
    Campo-Engelstein L; Howland LE; Parker WM; Burcher P
    Birth; 2015 Jun; 42(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 25881794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do pregnant women prefer timing of elective cesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks of gestation? Secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial.
    Glavind J; Henriksen TB; Kindberg SF; Uldbjerg N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1782-6. PubMed ID: 24397308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Historic cohort study on mode of delivery of a macrosomic baby: the women's point of view.
    Vercellini P; Fumagalli M; Consonni D; de Braud L; Barbara G; Iurlaro E; Mosca F; Fedele L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Nov; 94(11):1235-44. PubMed ID: 26248808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women's views on elective primary caesarean section.
    Pakenham S; Chamberlain SM; Smith GN
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Dec; 28(12):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 17169232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of social factors of pregnant women's cesarean section demands].
    Guo H; Zhou X; Li S
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Sep; 80(9):675-7. PubMed ID: 11798835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
    Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision making in patient-initiated elective cesarean delivery: the influence of birth stories.
    Munro S; Kornelsen J; Hutton E
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):373-379. PubMed ID: 19720338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Women's empowerment and elective cesarean section for a single pregnancy: a population-based and multivariate study in Vietnam.
    de Loenzien M; Mac QNH; Dumont A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jan; 21(1):3. PubMed ID: 33397311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
    Karlström A; Nystedt A; Johansson M; Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons? A systematic review of the qualitative literature.
    O'Donovan C; O'Donovan J
    Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 29105822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean?
    Hopkins K
    Soc Sci Med; 2000 Sep; 51(5):725-40. PubMed ID: 10975232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature.
    McCourt C; Weaver J; Statham H; Beake S; Gamble J; Creedy DK
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 17324181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review of nulliparous women's views of planned cesarean birth: the missing component in the debate about a term cephalic trial.
    Kingdon C; Baker L; Lavender T
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 16948723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A critique of the literature on women's request for cesarean section.
    Gamble J; Creedy DK; McCourt C; Weaver J; Beake S
    Birth; 2007 Dec; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 18021149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Too posh to push": the rise and rise of a catchphrase.
    Weaver J; Magill-Cuerden J
    Birth; 2013 Dec; 40(4):264-71. PubMed ID: 24344707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A qualitative approach to examine women's experience of planned cesarean.
    Blüml V; Stammler-Safar M; Reitinger AK; Resch I; Naderer A; Leithner K
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2012; 41(6):E82-90. PubMed ID: 22861149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature.
    Gamble JA; Creedy DK
    Birth; 2000 Dec; 27(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 11251511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks.
    Emmett CL; Shaw AR; Montgomery AA; Murphy DJ;
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1438-45. PubMed ID: 17081180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information for women after CS: are they getting enough?
    Lucas A
    RCM Midwives; 2004 Nov; 7(11):472-5. PubMed ID: 15612178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.