These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25882580)

  • 1. Trainee colonoscopists fulfil quality standards for the detection of adenomatous polyps.
    Klare P; Ascher S; Wagenpfeil S; Rapp D; Bajbouj M; Neu B; Schmid RM; von Delius S
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Feb; 15():26. PubMed ID: 25882580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of colonoscopy performance among gastroenterology and surgical trainees: a need for common training standards for all trainees?
    Leyden JE; Doherty GA; Hanley A; McNamara DA; Shields C; Leader M; Murray FE; Patchett SE; Harewood GC
    Endoscopy; 2011 Nov; 43(11):935-40. PubMed ID: 21997723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trainee participation and adenoma detection rates during screening colonoscopies.
    Chalifoux SL; Rao DS; Wani SB; Sharma P; Bansal A; Gupta N; Rastogi A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 48(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 24440932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists.
    Lee JY; Koh M; Lee JH
    Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Aug; 66(8):2756-2762. PubMed ID: 32808142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
    Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
    Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trainees' adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥ 10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy.
    Gromski MA; Miller CA; Lee SH; Park ES; Lee TH; Park SH; Chung IK; Kim SJ; Hwangbo Y
    Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1337-42. PubMed ID: 22083333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cap-assisted colonoscopy and detection of Adenomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial.
    Pohl H; Bensen SP; Toor A; Gordon SR; Levy LC; Berk B; Anderson PB; Anderson JC; Rothstein RI; MacKenzie TA; Robertson DJ
    Endoscopy; 2015 Oct; 47(10):891-7. PubMed ID: 26126162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equivalence in colonoscopy results between gastroenterologists and general surgery residents following an endoscopy simulation curriculum.
    Williams MR; Crossett JR; Cleveland EM; Smoot CP; Aluka KJ; Coviello LC; Davis KG
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(4):654-7. PubMed ID: 25887504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adenoma detection rate varies greatly during colonoscopy training.
    van Doorn SC; Klanderman RB; Hazewinkel Y; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jul; 82(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 25817896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the hands-on, technical training of residents in colonoscopy affect quality outcomes?
    Pace D; Borgaonkar M; Hickey N; Evans B; Lougheed M; Marcoux C; McGrath J; Boone D; O'Leary M; Smith C
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1352-5. PubMed ID: 26169644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection.
    Buchner AM; Shahid MW; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; McNeil RB; Cleveland P; Gill KR; Schore A; Ghabril M; Raimondo M; Gross SA; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jun; 73(6):1223-31. PubMed ID: 21481861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Longitudinal Study of Adenoma Detection Rate in Gastroenterology Fellowship Training.
    Gianotti RJ; Oza SS; Tapper EB; Kothari D; Sheth SG
    Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Oct; 61(10):2831-2837. PubMed ID: 27405989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.
    Ng S; Sreenivasan AK; Pecoriello J; Liang PS
    Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Aug; 65(8):2229-2233. PubMed ID: 31927766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does trainee participation during colonoscopy affect adenoma detection rates?
    Eckardt AJ; Swales C; Bhattacharya K; Wassef WY; Leung K; Levey JM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Jul; 52(7):1337-44. PubMed ID: 19571713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Does the Participation of a Resident Matter?
    Turner JS; Henry D; Chase A; Kpodzo D; Flood MC; Clark CE
    Am Surg; 2018 Jun; 84(6):1064-1068. PubMed ID: 29981650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
    Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Goalposts Have Moved: Can Surgery Residents Meet Updated Quality Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy?
    Ortolani JB; Tershak DR; Ferrara JJ; Paget CJ
    Am Surg; 2016 Sep; 82(9):835-8. PubMed ID: 27670573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intermediate-length colonoscope needs more training duration than long-length colonoscope.
    Kim YG; Kim KJ; Yang DH; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Kim JH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):1007-13. PubMed ID: 24957569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates during endoscopic training: a venture into uncharted territory.
    Munroe CA; Lee P; Copland A; Wu KK; Kaltenbach T; Soetikno RM; Friedland S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 22341103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.