152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25883643)
1. The diagnostic value of brush cytology alone and in combination with tumor markers in pancreaticobiliary strictures.
Kuzu UB; Ödemiş B; Turhan N; Parlak E; Dişibeyaz S; Suna N; Öztaş E; Akpınar MY; Aksoy A; Torun S; Yıldız H; Kayaçetin E
Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2015; 2015():580254. PubMed ID: 25883643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures.
Ryan ME; Baldauf MC
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):133-9. PubMed ID: 8013809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Prospective comparative study of ERCP brush cytology and EUS-FNA for the differential diagnosis of biliary strictures].
Novis M; Ardengh JC; Libera ED; Nakao FS; Ornellas LC; Santo GC; Venco F; Ferrari AP
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2010 Jun; 37(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 21079891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results.
DeWitt J; Misra VL; Leblanc JK; McHenry L; Sherman S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Sep; 64(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 16923477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of microsatellite marker loss of heterozygosity in accurate diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy from brush cytology samples.
Khalid A; Pal R; Sasatomi E; Swalsky P; Slivka A; Whitcomb D; Finkelstein S
Gut; 2004 Dec; 53(12):1860-5. PubMed ID: 15542529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic yield of brush cytology for biliary stenosis during ERCP.
Temiño López-Jurado R; Cacho Acosta G; Argüelles Pintos M; Rodríguez Caravaca G; Lledó Navarro JL; Fernández Rodríguez C
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2009 Jun; 101(6):385-9, 390-4. PubMed ID: 19630461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of Factors Affecting the Sensitivity of Bile Duct Brush Cytology.
Kobayashi M; Ryozawa S; Araki R; Nagata K; Tanisaka Y; Fujita A; Kobatake T
Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 58(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 30146607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined brush cytology and stent placement in a single session for presumed malignant biliary stricture.
Kawada N; Uehara H; Katayama K; Takano Y; Takakura R; Imanaka K; Ohkawa K; Takenaka A; Ishikawa O
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Aug; 26(8):1247-51. PubMed ID: 21443662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of DNA ploidy and S-phase evaluation in the assessment of malignancy in biliary strictures.
Lindberg B; Enochsson L; Tribukait B; Arnelo U; Bergquist A
Endoscopy; 2006 Jun; 38(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 16802266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction.
de Bellis M; Fogel EL; Sherman S; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Younger C; Cramer H; Lehman GA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Aug; 58(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 12872082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of DNA image cytometry combined with brush routine cytology in diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures: A large sample size retrospective study.
Yang X; Sun L; Guo J; Gao L; Qin C; Jin Z
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2036-2042. PubMed ID: 30963609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective controlled study comparing brush and bile exfoliative cytology for diagnosing bile duct strictures.
Kurzawinski T; Deery A; Dooley J; Dick R; Hobbs K; Davidson B
Gut; 1992 Dec; 33(12):1675-7. PubMed ID: 1487170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis of biliary strictures in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, with special reference to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Lindberg B; Arnelo U; Bergquist A; Thörne A; Hjerpe A; Granqvist S; Hansson LO; Tribukait B; Persson B; Broomé U
Endoscopy; 2002 Nov; 34(11):909-16. PubMed ID: 12430077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of brush cytology for dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Ponsioen CY; Vrouenraets SM; van Milligen de Wit AW; Sturm P; Tascilar M; Offerhaus GJ; Prins M; Huibregtse K; Tytgat GN
Endoscopy; 1999 May; 31(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 10376457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors Associated with Malignant Biliary Strictures in Patients with Atypical or Suspicious Cells on Brush Cytology.
Park JY; Jeon TJ
Clin Endosc; 2019 Mar; 52(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 30625267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of Malignant Biliary Strictures: Conventional or Negative Pressure Brush Cytology?
Abbasi MR; Ghazi Mirsaeed SM; Mohammad Alizadeh AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016 Oct; 17(10):4563-4566. PubMed ID: 27892663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of brush cytology from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on patient management at a UK teaching hospital.
Sethi R; Singh K; Warner B; Mahadeva U; Wilkinson M
Frontline Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 7(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 27103983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignancy: a single center experience.
Stoos-Veić T; Bilić B; Kaić G; Ostović KT; Babić Z; Kujundzić M
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 20432742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic biliary brush cytology by digital image analysis.
Rumalla A; Baron TH; Leontovich O; Burgart LJ; Yacavone RF; Therneau TM; de Groen PC; Sebo TJ
Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jan; 76(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11155409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
