519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25884158)
1. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle.
Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values in Hereford beef cattle using national or international training populations.
Saatchi M; Ward J; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1538-51. PubMed ID: 23345550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of model specifications on the reliabilities of genomic prediction in a Swedish-Finnish red breed cattle population.
Rius-Vilarrasa E; Brøndum RF; Strandén I; Guldbrandtsen B; Strandberg E; Lund MS; Fikse WF
J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Oct; 129(5):369-79. PubMed ID: 22963358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genome-enabled prediction of meat and carcass traits using Bayesian regression, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and blending methods in Nelore cattle.
Lopes FB; Baldi F; Passafaro TL; Brunes LC; Costa MFO; Eifert EC; Narciso MG; Rosa GJM; Lobo RB; Magnabosco CU
Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100006. PubMed ID: 33516009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction.
Wientjes YC; Calus MP; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 May; 47(1):42. PubMed ID: 25951906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic selection for crossbred performance accounting for breed-specific effects.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; Hidalgo AM; van Arendonk JAM; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JWM
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):51. PubMed ID: 28651536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle.
Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD
J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AC; Verbyla K; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Nov; 41(1):51. PubMed ID: 19930712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-breed and multi-trait co-association analysis of meat tenderness and other meat quality traits in three French beef cattle breeds.
Ramayo-Caldas Y; Renand G; Ballester M; Saintilan R; Rocha D
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():37. PubMed ID: 27107817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle.
Neves HH; Carvalheiro R; O'Brien AM; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Schenkel FS; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Cole JB; da Silva MV; Queiroz SA; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):17. PubMed ID: 24575732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive performance of genomic selection methods for carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle: impacts of the genetic architecture.
Mehrban H; Lee DH; Moradi MH; IlCho C; Naserkheil M; Ibáñez-Escriche N
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):1. PubMed ID: 28093066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
