These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25884158)
1. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle. Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values in Hereford beef cattle using national or international training populations. Saatchi M; Ward J; Garrick DJ J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1538-51. PubMed ID: 23345550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle. Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes. Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle. Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs. Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of model specifications on the reliabilities of genomic prediction in a Swedish-Finnish red breed cattle population. Rius-Vilarrasa E; Brøndum RF; Strandén I; Guldbrandtsen B; Strandberg E; Lund MS; Fikse WF J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Oct; 129(5):369-79. PubMed ID: 22963358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genome-enabled prediction of meat and carcass traits using Bayesian regression, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and blending methods in Nelore cattle. Lopes FB; Baldi F; Passafaro TL; Brunes LC; Costa MFO; Eifert EC; Narciso MG; Rosa GJM; Lobo RB; Magnabosco CU Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100006. PubMed ID: 33516009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction. Wientjes YC; Calus MP; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ Genet Sel Evol; 2015 May; 47(1):42. PubMed ID: 25951906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic selection for crossbred performance accounting for breed-specific effects. Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; Hidalgo AM; van Arendonk JAM; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JWM Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):51. PubMed ID: 28651536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle. Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle. Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep. Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes. Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AC; Verbyla K; Goddard ME Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Nov; 41(1):51. PubMed ID: 19930712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-breed and multi-trait co-association analysis of meat tenderness and other meat quality traits in three French beef cattle breeds. Ramayo-Caldas Y; Renand G; Ballester M; Saintilan R; Rocha D Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():37. PubMed ID: 27107817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle. Neves HH; Carvalheiro R; O'Brien AM; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Schenkel FS; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Cole JB; da Silva MV; Queiroz SA; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):17. PubMed ID: 24575732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive performance of genomic selection methods for carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle: impacts of the genetic architecture. Mehrban H; Lee DH; Moradi MH; IlCho C; Naserkheil M; Ibáñez-Escriche N Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):1. PubMed ID: 28093066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]