634 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25884200)
1. Limitations of the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay when compared to three commonly used cell enumeration assays.
van Tonder A; Joubert AM; Cromarty AD
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Feb; 8():47. PubMed ID: 25884200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Caveats to the use of MTT, neutral red, Hoechst and Resazurin to measure silver nanoparticle cytotoxicity.
Mello DF; Trevisan R; Rivera N; Geitner NK; Di Giulio RT; Wiesner MR; Hsu-Kim H; Meyer JN
Chem Biol Interact; 2020 Jan; 315():108868. PubMed ID: 31669321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Basic Colorimetric Proliferation Assays: MTT, WST, and Resazurin.
Präbst K; Engelhardt H; Ringgeler S; Hübner H
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1601():1-17. PubMed ID: 28470513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assay of anticancer drugs in tissue culture: comparison of a tetrazolium-based assay and a protein binding dye assay in short-term cultures derived from human malignant glioma.
Haselsberger K; Peterson DC; Thomas DG; Darling JL
Anticancer Drugs; 1996 May; 7(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 8792008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serum albumin leads to false-positive results in the XTT and the MTT assay.
Funk D; Schrenk HH; Frei E
Biotechniques; 2007 Aug; 43(2):178, 180, 182 passim. PubMed ID: 17824385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The noncellular reduction of MTT tetrazolium salt by TiO₂ nanoparticles and its implications for cytotoxicity assays.
Lupu AR; Popescu T
Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Aug; 27(5):1445-50. PubMed ID: 23531555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of the viability reagent PrestoBlue in comparison with alamarBlue and MTT to assess the viability of human corneal epithelial cells.
Xu M; McCanna DJ; Sivak JG
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 71():1-7. PubMed ID: 25464019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of the pH dependence of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide-formazan absorption on chemosensitivity determined by a novel tetrazolium-based assay.
Plumb JA; Milroy R; Kaye SB
Cancer Res; 1989 Aug; 49(16):4435-40. PubMed ID: 2743332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cell Enumeration Assays: Application of the MTT and Sulforhodamine B Assays to Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Neonatal Rodent Microglia.
Facci L; Skaper SD
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1727():167-178. PubMed ID: 29222781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The pyruvic acid analog 3-bromopyruvate interferes with the tetrazolium reagent MTS in the evaluation of cytotoxicity.
Ganapathy-Kanniappan S; Geschwind JF; Kunjithapatham R; Buijs M; Syed LH; Rao PP; Ota S; Vali M
Assay Drug Dev Technol; 2010 Apr; 8(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 20085459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of in vitro anticancer-drug-screening data generated with a tetrazolium assay versus a protein assay against a diverse panel of human tumor cell lines.
Rubinstein LV; Shoemaker RH; Paull KD; Simon RM; Tosini S; Skehan P; Scudiero DA; Monks A; Boyd MR
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1990 Jul; 82(13):1113-8. PubMed ID: 2359137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neutral Red versus MTT assay of cell viability in the presence of copper compounds.
Gomez Perez M; Fourcade L; Mateescu MA; Paquin J
Anal Biochem; 2017 Oct; 535():43-46. PubMed ID: 28778493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-content image analysis (HCIA) assay has the highest correlation with direct counting cell suspension compared to the ATP, WST-8 and Alamar blue assays for measurement of cytotoxicity.
Tahara H; Matsuda S; Yamamoto Y; Yoshizawa H; Fujita M; Katsuoka Y; Kasahara T
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2017 Nov; 88(Pt 1):92-99. PubMed ID: 28807796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of alamar blue and MTT assays for high through-put screening.
Hamid R; Rotshteyn Y; Rabadi L; Parikh R; Bullock P
Toxicol In Vitro; 2004 Oct; 18(5):703-10. PubMed ID: 15251189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An improved 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction assay for evaluating the viability of Escherichia coli cells.
Wang H; Cheng H; Wang F; Wei D; Wang X
J Microbiol Methods; 2010 Sep; 82(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 20619304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of clonogenic, microtetrazolium and sulforhodamine B assays for determination of cisplatin cytotoxicity in human ovarian carcinoma cell lines.
Perez RP; Godwin AK; Handel LM; Hamilton TC
Eur J Cancer; 1993; 29A(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 8398340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pitfalls of the MTT assay: Direct and off-target effects of inhibitors can result in over/underestimation of cell viability.
Stepanenko AA; Dmitrenko VV
Gene; 2015 Dec; 574(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 26260013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three different cell viability assays for evaluation of vanadyl sulphate cytotoxicity in a Chinese hamster ovary K1 cell line.
Zwolak I
Toxicol Ind Health; 2016 Jun; 32(6):1013-25. PubMed ID: 25107459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of an in vitro reproductive screening assay for novel pharmaceutical compounds.
Edwards V; Markovic E; Matisons J; Young F
Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2008 Oct; 51(Pt 2):63-71. PubMed ID: 18171324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinct glycolysis inhibitors determine retinal cell sensitivity to glutamate-mediated injury.
Rego AC; Areias FM; Santos MS; Oliveira CR
Neurochem Res; 1999 Mar; 24(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 10215508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
