These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

557 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25884359)

  • 41. Fat myringoplasty outcome analysis with otoendoscopy: who is the suitable patient?
    Konstantinidis I; Malliari H; Tsakiropoulou E; Constantinidis J
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 23202155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Myringoplasty: long-term results in adults and children.
    Gersdorff M; Garin P; Decat M; Juantegui M
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jul; 16(4):532-5. PubMed ID: 8588656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Transcanal endoscopic myringoplasty: a case series in a university center.
    Garcia Lde B; Moussalem GF; Andrade JS; Mangussi-Gomes J; Cruz OL; Penido Nde O; Testa JR
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 26642752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical and audiological short-term and long-term outcomes of fat graft myringoplasty.
    Knutsson J; Kahlin A; von Unge M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 137(9):940-944. PubMed ID: 28537107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical study of transcanal closure of tympanic membrane perforations using a collagen sponge.
    Tamae A; Komune S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Mar; 129 Suppl 2():S21-6. PubMed ID: 25706156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A new graft material for myringoplasty: bacterial cellulose.
    Biskin S; Damar M; Oktem SN; Sakalli E; Erdem D; Pakir O
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3561-3565. PubMed ID: 26956980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Tutopatch graft for transcanal myringoplasty.
    Gérard JM; Gersdorff M
    B-ENT; 2006; 2(4):177-9. PubMed ID: 17256404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of the anatomical and auditory outcomes of minimally invasive cartilage myringoplasty: Our technique and experience.
    Simsek E; Ozkan O; Kucur C; Carlıoglu A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(6):517-522. PubMed ID: 27567383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Myringoplasty using rotation flap of canal skin for total tympanic membrane perforation.
    Memari F; Hassannia F
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Oct; 41(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 24938374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Endoscopic transtympanic cartilage push-through myringoplasty without tympanomeatal flap elevation for tympanic membrane perforation.
    Gu F
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Sep; 141(9):831-834. PubMed ID: 34420483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Long-Term Follow-Up After Fat Graft Myringoplasty: Do Size and Location Matter?
    Diaz AR; Reina CO; Plaza G; Posadas ER; Arevalo FV; Iriarte MTG
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Jun; 100(3_suppl):229S-234S. PubMed ID: 33314958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Endoscopic vs microscopic myringoplasty: a different perspective.
    Lade H; Choudhary SR; Vashishth A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 271(7):1897-902. PubMed ID: 23999592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Endoscope or microscope-guided pediatric tympanoplasty? Comparison of grafting technique and outcome.
    James AL
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Nov; 127(11):2659-2664. PubMed ID: 28304079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A novel myringoplasty technique: the placement of a complementary graft descending from the scutum to support an anterosuperior perforation.
    Sakalli E; Celikyurt C; Biskin S; Erdurak SC
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 274(1):127-131. PubMed ID: 27515708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. "Mucosal pocket" myringoplasty: a modification of underlay technique for anterior or subtotal perforations.
    Faramarzi A; Hashemi SB; Rajaee A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(6):708-13. PubMed ID: 22901662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic transcanal inlay butterfly cartilage myringoplasty.
    Ravi N; Meher R; Rathore PK; Singh I
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(4):102978. PubMed ID: 33621762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Myringoplasty in children: retrospective analysis of 60 cases.
    Abdellatif H; Youssef R; Omar M; Hassan N; Lahcen A; Abdelaziz R
    Pan Afr Med J; 2015; 20():82. PubMed ID: 26090040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Prognostic factors in pediatric myringoplasty. A review of 90 cases].
    Lassaletta Atienza L; Villafruella Sanz MA; Ballesteros García A; Granell Navarro J; Alvarez Vicent JJ
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999; 50(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10091341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Endoscopic Perichondrium-Cartilage Myringoplasty With Preserving of Anterior Margins and Tuck Grafts for Repairing Anterior Perforation With 3 year Followup.
    Liu Y; Wei R; Ding Y; Li Y; Xin Y; Li D
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2024 Feb; 133(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 37592410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pediatric myringoplasty: does previous adenoidectomy improve the likelihood of perforation closure?
    Charlett SD; Knight LC
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):939-42. PubMed ID: 19692939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.