These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25884587)
1. Comparing variant calling algorithms for target-exon sequencing in a large sample. Lo Y; Kang HM; Nelson MR; Othman MI; Chissoe SL; Ehm MG; Abecasis GR; Zöllner S BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 16():75. PubMed ID: 25884587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variant calling in low-coverage whole genome sequencing of a Native American population sample. Bizon C; Spiegel M; Chasse SA; Gizer IR; Li Y; Malc EP; Mieczkowski PA; Sailsbery JK; Wang X; Ehlers CL; Wilhelmsen KC BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():85. PubMed ID: 24479562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken. Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using genotype array data to compare multi- and single-sample variant calls and improve variant call sets from deep coverage whole-genome sequencing data. Shringarpure SS; Mathias RA; Hernandez RD; O'Connor TD; Szpiech ZA; Torres R; De La Vega FM; Bustamante CD; Barnes KC; Taub MA; Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28035032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing single nucleotide variant detection and genotype calling on whole-genome sequenced individuals. Cheng AY; Teo YY; Ong RT Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1707-13. PubMed ID: 24558117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study. Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. iCall: a genotype-calling algorithm for rare, low-frequency and common variants on the Illumina exome array. Zhou J; Tantoso E; Wong LP; Ong RT; Bei JX; Li Y; Liu J; Khor CC; Teo YY Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1714-20. PubMed ID: 24567545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): improving the quality of exome variant genotypes. Trubetskoy V; Rodriguez A; Dave U; Campbell N; Crawford EL; Cook EH; Sutcliffe JS; Foster I; Madduri R; Cox NJ; Davis LK Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing batch effects of genotype calling algorithm BRLMM for the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 500 K array set using 270 HapMap samples. Hong H; Su Z; Ge W; Shi L; Perkins R; Fang H; Xu J; Chen JJ; Han T; Kaput J; Fuscoe JC; Tong W BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 9 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S17. PubMed ID: 18793462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generation of SNP datasets for orangutan population genomics using improved reduced-representation sequencing and direct comparisons of SNP calling algorithms. Greminger MP; Stölting KN; Nater A; Goossens B; Arora N; Bruggmann R; Patrignani A; Nussberger B; Sharma R; Kraus RH; Ambu LN; Singleton I; Chikhi L; van Schaik CP; Krützen M BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():16. PubMed ID: 24405840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PhredEM: a phred-score-informed genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies. Liao P; Satten GA; Hu YJ Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):375-387. PubMed ID: 28560825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A computational method for genotype calling in family-based sequencing data. Chang LC; Li B; Fang Z; Vrieze S; McGue M; Iacono WG; Tseng GC; Chen W BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17():37. PubMed ID: 26772743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data. Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation. Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison and evaluation of two exome capture kits and sequencing platforms for variant calling. Zhang G; Wang J; Yang J; Li W; Deng Y; Li J; Huang J; Hu S; Zhang B BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):581. PubMed ID: 26242175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An integrative variant analysis pipeline for accurate genotype/haplotype inference in population NGS data. Wang Y; Lu J; Yu J; Gibbs RA; Yu F Genome Res; 2013 May; 23(5):833-42. PubMed ID: 23296920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the Calling Performance of a Rare Disease NGS Panel for Single Nucleotide and Copy Number Variants. Cacheiro P; Ordóñez-Ugalde A; Quintáns B; Piñeiro-Hermida S; Amigo J; García-Murias M; Pascual-Pascual SI; Grandas F; Arpa J; Carracedo A; Sobrido MJ Mol Diagn Ther; 2017 Jun; 21(3):303-313. PubMed ID: 28290094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal sequencing depth design for whole genome re-sequencing in pigs. Jiang Y; Jiang Y; Wang S; Zhang Q; Ding X BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):556. PubMed ID: 31703550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combining sequence data from multiple studies: Impact of analysis strategies on rare variant calling and association results. Chen Z; Boehnke M; Fuchsberger C Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 44(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 31520493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]