259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25885056)
1. Measurement of myocardial blood flow by cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion: comparison of distributed parameter and Fermi models with single and dual bolus.
Papanastasiou G; Williams MC; Kershaw LE; Dweck MR; Alam S; Mirsadraee S; Connell M; Gray C; MacGillivray T; Newby DE; Semple SI
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 25885056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of Fermi and distributed parameter modeling against invasive methods.
Papanastasiou G; Williams MC; Dweck MR; Alam S; Cooper A; Mirsadraee S; Newby DE; Semple SI
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Sep; 18(1):57. PubMed ID: 27624746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sub-segmental quantification of single (stress)-pass perfusion CMR improves the diagnostic accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease.
Le MTP; Zarinabad N; D'Angelo T; Mia I; Heinke R; Vogl TJ; Zeiher A; Nagel E; Puntmann VO
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Feb; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 32028980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of dual-saturation single bolus acquisition for quantitative cardiac perfusion and myocardial blood flow maps.
Sánchez-González J; Fernandez-Jiménez R; Nothnagel ND; López-Martín G; Fuster V; Ibañez B
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 17(1):21. PubMed ID: 25880970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification.
Kellman P; Hansen MS; Nielles-Vallespin S; Nickander J; Themudo R; Ugander M; Xue H
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Apr; 19(1):43. PubMed ID: 28385161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of stress perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance in follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions of the left main coronary artery.
Nanni S; Lovato L; Ghetti G; Vagnarelli F; Mineo G; Fattori R; Saia F; Marzocchi A; Marrozzini C; Zompatori M; Reggiani LB; Semprini F; Melandri G; Biagini E; Corsini A; Norscini G; Rapezzi C
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1589-1597. PubMed ID: 28455632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal Adenosine Stress for Maximum Stress Perfusion, Coronary Flow Reserve, and Pixel Distribution of Coronary Flow Capacity by Kolmogorov-Smirnov Analysis.
Kitkungvan D; Lai D; Zhu H; Roby AE; Johnson NP; Steptoe DD; Patel MB; Kirkeeide R; Gould KL
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 28213449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with coronary magnetic resonance angiography, stress-perfusion, and delayed-enhancement imaging for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals.
Song KD; Kim SM; Choe YH; Jung W; Lee SC; Chang SA; Choi YH; Sung J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():77-89. PubMed ID: 25916321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Mapping by CMR to Detect Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Validation Against Invasive Coronary Physiology.
Kotecha T; Martinez-Naharro A; Boldrini M; Knight D; Hawkins P; Kalra S; Patel D; Coghlan G; Moon J; Plein S; Lockie T; Rakhit R; Patel N; Xue H; Kellman P; Fontana M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 12(10):1958-1969. PubMed ID: 30772231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative three-dimensional myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with accurate two-dimensional arterial input function assessment.
Wissmann L; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Manka R; Kozerke S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Dec; 17():108. PubMed ID: 26637221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a universal dual-bolus injection scheme for the quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Ishida M; Schuster A; Morton G; Chiribiri A; Hussain S; Paul M; Merkle N; Steen H; Lossnitzer D; Schnackenburg B; Alfakih K; Plein S; Nagel E
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 May; 13(1):28. PubMed ID: 21609423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Comparison of Clinical Analysis Methods for the Detection of Vessel-Specific Ischemia.
Rossi A; Wragg A; Klotz E; Pirro F; Moon JC; Nieman K; Pugliese F
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 28389506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study.
Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adenosine stress CMR T1-mapping detects early microvascular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without obstructive coronary artery disease.
Levelt E; Piechnik SK; Liu A; Wijesurendra RS; Mahmod M; Ariga R; Francis JM; Greiser A; Clarke K; Neubauer S; Ferreira VM; Karamitsos TD
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Oct; 19(1):81. PubMed ID: 29070069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging identifies reduced flow reserve in microvascular coronary artery disease.
Zorach B; Shaw PW; Bourque J; Kuruvilla S; Balfour PC; Yang Y; Mathew R; Pan J; Gonzalez JA; Taylor AM; Meyer CH; Epstein FH; Kramer CM; Salerno M
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Feb; 20(1):14. PubMed ID: 29471856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy.
Foley JRJ; Kidambi A; Biglands JD; Maredia N; Dickinson CJ; Plein S; Greenwood JP
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Nov; 19(1):84. PubMed ID: 29110669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Voxel-wise quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: effect of variations in methodology and validation with positron emission tomography.
Miller CA; Naish JH; Ainslie MP; Tonge C; Tout D; Arumugam P; Banerji A; Egdell RM; Clark D; Weale P; Steadman CD; McCann GP; Ray SG; Parker GJ; Schmitt M
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jan; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 24460930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined Assessment of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Flow Measurement in the Coronary Sinus Improves Prediction of Functionally Significant Coronary Stenosis Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve in Multivessel Disease.
Nakamori S; Sakuma H; Dohi K; Ishida M; Tanigawa T; Yamada A; Takase S; Nakajima H; Sawai T; Masuda J; Nagata M; Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Fujii E; Yamada N; Ito M
J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jan; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 29432130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Underestimation of myocardial blood flow by dynamic perfusion CT: Explanations by two-compartment model analysis and limited temporal sampling of dynamic CT.
Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Ichihara T; Natsume T; Nakayama R; Nagasawa N; Kubooka M; Ito T; Uno M; Goto Y; Nagata M; Sakuma H
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 26851149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Constrained estimation of the arterial input function for myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Fluckiger JU; Schabel MC; DiBella EV
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Aug; 66(2):419-27. PubMed ID: 21446030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
