These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25885108)
1. Developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program. Vaughan B BMC Med Educ; 2015 Apr; 15():70. PubMed ID: 25885108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the measurement properties of the osteopathy clinical teaching questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Vaughan B Chiropr Man Therap; 2018; 26():13. PubMed ID: 29744031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the student-led osteopathy clinical learning environment prepare students for practice? Abrey C; De Silva N; Godwin J; Jacotine T; Raab D; Urquhart K; Mumford K; McLaughlin P; Vaughan B BMC Med Educ; 2022 Aug; 22(1):603. PubMed ID: 35927729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Mokken scale analysis of the peer physical examination questionnaire. Vaughan B; Grace S Chiropr Man Therap; 2018; 26():6. PubMed ID: 29507714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol. MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The DREEM, part 2: psychometric properties in an osteopathic student population. Vaughan B; Mulcahy J; McLaughlin P BMC Med Educ; 2014 May; 14():100. PubMed ID: 24884704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation in undergraduate medical education: Conceptualizing and validating a novel questionnaire for assessing the quality of bedside teaching. Dreiling K; Montano D; Poinstingl H; Müller T; Schiekirka-Schwake S; Anders S; von Steinbüchel N; Raupach T Med Teach; 2017 Aug; 39(8):820-827. PubMed ID: 28532203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The DREEM, part 1: measurement of the educational environment in an osteopathy teaching program. Vaughan B; Carter A; Macfarlane C; Morrison T BMC Med Educ; 2014 May; 14():99. PubMed ID: 24884931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of psychometric properties of the modified SETQ tool in undergraduate medical education. Al Ansari A; Strachan K; Hashim S; Otoom S BMC Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 17(1):56. PubMed ID: 28302151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the 25-Item Stanford Faculty Development Program Tool on Clinical Teaching Effectiveness. Mintz M; Southern DA; Ghali WA; Ma IW Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 25893939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical educator self-efficacy, self-evaluation and its relationship with student evaluations of clinical teaching. Vaughan B BMC Med Educ; 2020 Oct; 20(1):347. PubMed ID: 33032596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing Preceptor Use of Cognitive Apprenticeship: Is the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) a Useful Approach? Rodino AM; Wolcott MD Teach Learn Med; 2019; 31(5):506-518. PubMed ID: 31064222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Using the SETQ system to evaluate and improve teaching qualities of clinical teachers]. Lombarts MJ; Arah OA; Busch OR; Heineman MJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A1222. PubMed ID: 20170574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Level of teaching competence at the Undergraduate Medical Internship of UNAM's Faculty of Medicine]. Martínez-González A; Lifshitz-Guinzberg A; González-Quintanilla E; Monterrosas-Rojas AM; Flores-Hernández F; Gatica-Lara F; Martínez-Franco AI; Sánchez-Mendiola M Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2017; 55(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 29190872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Redesign of the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities in Anesthesiology Residency Training (SETQ Smart). Lombarts KM; Ferguson A; Hollmann MW; Malling B; ; Arah OA Anesthesiology; 2016 Nov; 125(5):1056-1065. PubMed ID: 27606931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of the Attitudes Toward Osteopathic Principles and Practice Scale (ATOPPS): preliminary results. Russo DP; Stoll ST; Shores JH J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2003 Sep; 103(9):429-34. PubMed ID: 14527078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Osteopathic educators' attitudes towards osteopathic principles and their application in clinical practice: A qualitative inquiry. Kasiri-Martino H; Bright P Man Ther; 2016 Feb; 21():233-40. PubMed ID: 26427824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of a viva assessment of clinical reasoning in an Australian pre-professional osteopathy program assessed using generalizability theory. Vaughan B; Orrock P; Grace S J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():1. PubMed ID: 28104901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey. Consorti F; Mancuso R; Piccolo A; Consorti G; Zurlo J BMC Med Educ; 2013 Aug; 13():111. PubMed ID: 23968312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating teaching effectiveness in nursing education: an Iranian perspective. Salsali M BMC Med Educ; 2005 Jul; 5():29. PubMed ID: 16045808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]