BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25885894)

  • 1. Improving the computational efficiency of fully Bayes inference and assessing the effect of misspecification of hyperparameters in whole-genome prediction models.
    Yang W; Chen C; Tempelman RJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):13. PubMed ID: 25885894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity to prior specification in Bayesian genome-based prediction models.
    Lehermeier C; Wimmer V; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Gianola D; Schmid VJ; Schön CC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Jun; 12(3):375-91. PubMed ID: 23629460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of alternative random regression and reaction norm models for whole genome predictions.
    Yang W; Chen C; Steibel JP; Ernst CW; Bates RO; Zhou L; Tempelman RJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2678-92. PubMed ID: 26115256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting GEBV accuracy with single-step Bayesian models.
    Zhou L; Mrode R; Zhang S; Zhang Q; Li B; Liu JF
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Jan; 120(2):100-109. PubMed ID: 29167557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast genomic prediction of breeding values using parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo with convergence diagnosis.
    Guo P; Zhu B; Niu H; Wang Z; Liang Y; Chen Y; Zhang L; Ni H; Guo Y; Hay EHA; Gao X; Gao H; Wu X; Xu L; Li J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 29298666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian antedependence model for whole genome prediction.
    Yang W; Tempelman RJ
    Genetics; 2012 Apr; 190(4):1491-501. PubMed ID: 22135352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A fast EM algorithm for BayesA-like prediction of genomic breeding values.
    Sun X; Qu L; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC; Fernando RL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49157. PubMed ID: 23152868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection.
    Habier D; Fernando RL; Kizilkaya K; Garrick DJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():186. PubMed ID: 21605355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fast and efficient Gibbs sampler for BayesB in whole-genome analyses.
    Cheng H; Qu L; Garrick DJ; Fernando RL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():80. PubMed ID: 26467850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
    Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic prediction using an iterative conditional expectation algorithm for a fast BayesC-like model.
    Dong L; Wang Z
    Genetica; 2018 Oct; 146(4-5):361-368. PubMed ID: 29948517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fully Bayesian estimation of Gibbs hyperparameters for emission computed tomography data.
    Higdon DM; Bowsher JE; Johnson VE; Turkington TG; Gilland DR; Jaszczak RJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):516-26. PubMed ID: 9368107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Genomic Bayesian Multi-trait and Multi-environment Model.
    Montesinos-López OA; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J; Toledo FH; Pérez-Hernández O; Eskridge KM; Rutkoski J
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Sep; 6(9):2725-44. PubMed ID: 27342738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A fast algorithm for BayesB type of prediction of genome-wide estimates of genetic value.
    Meuwissen TH; Solberg TR; Shepherd R; Woolliams JA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Jan; 41(1):2. PubMed ID: 19284681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of prior specifications in a shrinkage-inducing Bayesian model for quantitative trait mapping and genomic prediction.
    Knürr T; Läärä E; Sillanpää MJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):24. PubMed ID: 23834140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional models in genome-wide selection.
    Moura EG; Pamplona AKA; Balestre M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0222699. PubMed ID: 31644532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.