157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25886330)
1. Comparison of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size 2 and 2½ in anesthetized and paralyzed pediatric patients with same weight group: A prospective randomized clinical study.
Mahajan R; Taxak S
Anesth Essays Res; 2014; 8(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 25886330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: I-gel Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Following Digital Insertion in Nonparalyzed Anesthetized Patients.
Luthra A; Chauhan R; Jain A; Bhukal I; Mahajan S; Bala I
Anesth Essays Res; 2019; 13(4):669-675. PubMed ID: 32009713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Brimacombe L
Anesth Analg; 2002 Sep; 95(3):770-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12198070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Size 2.5 i-gel™ with Proseal LMA™ in Anaesthetised, Paralyzed Children Undergoing Elective Surgery.
Mitra S; Das B; Jamil SN
N Am J Med Sci; 2012 Oct; 4(10):453-7. PubMed ID: 23112965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Gupta R; Mahajan R; Jatinder M; Gulati S; Mehta A; Nazir R
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2019; 35(3):340-347. PubMed ID: 31543582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex-based ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size selection: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized, paralyzed male and female adult patients.
Kihara S; Brimacombe J
Anesth Analg; 2003 Jul; 97(1):280-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12818982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study.
Tham HM; Tan SM; Woon KL; Zhao YD
Can J Anaesth; 2010 Jul; 57(7):672-8. PubMed ID: 20411444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of laryngeal tube suction II and proseal LMA™ in pediatric patients, undergoing elective surgery.
Chandrakar S; Sreevastava DK; Bhasin S; Dhar M
Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(4):432-436. PubMed ID: 29033724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with the Laryngeal Tube Suction in mechanically ventilated patients.
Gaitini LA; Vaida SJ; Somri M; Yanovski B; Ben-David B; Hagberg CA
Anesthesiology; 2004 Aug; 101(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 15277913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway.
López-Gil M; Mantilla I; Blanco T; Teigell E; Hervias M; Fernández-López R
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 22295870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three supraglottic devices in anesthetised paralyzed children undergoing elective surgery.
Das B; Mitra S; Jamil SN; Varshney RK
Saudi J Anaesth; 2012 Jul; 6(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 23162394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube suction in elective non-laparoscopic surgeries of up to ninety minutes duration: A prospective, randomized study.
Verma S; Sharma SP
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2018; 34(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 29643624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective, randomized comparison of ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airways in anaesthetized neonates and infants.
Micaglio M; Bonato R; De Nardin M; Parotto M; Trevisanuto D; Zanardo V; Doglioni N; Ori C
Br J Anaesth; 2009 Aug; 103(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 19454544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, randomized, Single-blinded, comparative study of Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in pediatric patients.
Das B; Jamil SN; Mitra S; Varshney RK
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 28(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 22869936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Goldmann K; Roettger C; Wulf H
Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 16428533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Fullekrug B; Agrò F; Rosenblatt W; Dierdorf SF; Garcia de Lucas E; Capdevilla X; Brimacombe N
Anesthesiology; 2002 Feb; 96(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 11818758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison and evaluation of single-use LMA supreme versus the reusable proseal LMA in paralyzed patients undergoing surgery with controlled ventilation.
Sood S; Chahar S; Thakur A; Gupta M; Saxena A; Subramanian S
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2020; 36(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 33840930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of ventilatory efficacy and airway dynamics between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in adult patients during general anesthesia.
Kannan S; Harsoor SS; Sowmiya L; Nethra SS; DevikaRani D; Sathesha M
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2015; 31(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 26702211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Size 2 LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ in Spontaneously Breathing Children: a Randomised Clinical Trial.
Arslan Zİ; Balcı C; Oysu DA; Yılmaz M; Gürbüz N; Ilce Z
Balkan Med J; 2013 Mar; 30(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 25207076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
