These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25886492)

  • 1. A randomised controlled trial of personalised decision support delivered via the internet for bowel cancer screening with a faecal occult blood test: the effects of tailoring of messages according to social cognitive variables on participation.
    Wilson CJ; Flight IH; Turnbull D; Gregory T; Cole SR; Young GP; Zajac IT
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Apr; 15():25. PubMed ID: 25886492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protocol for population testing of an Internet-based Personalised Decision Support system for colorectal cancer screening.
    Wilson CJ; Flight IH; Zajac IT; Turnbull D; Young GP; Cole SR; Gregory T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2010 Sep; 10():50. PubMed ID: 20843369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tailored telephone counselling to increase participation of underusers in a population-based colorectal cancer-screening programme with faecal occult blood test: A randomized controlled trial.
    Denis B; Broc G; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Gana K; Perrin P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2017 Feb; 65(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28089385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitudes towards the Faecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) versus the Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening: perceived ease of completion and disgust.
    Chambers JA; Callander AS; Grangeret R; O'Carroll RE
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Feb; 16():96. PubMed ID: 26872450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake.
    Todorov K; Wilson C; Sharplin G; Corsini N
    Aust Health Rev; 2018 Feb; 42(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 28248632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?
    van Dam L; Korfage IJ; Kuipers EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Ballegooijen M; van Leerdam ME
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 49(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 23571149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mailed invitation strategies to improve fecal occult blood test participation in men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Duncan A; Zajac I; Flight I; Stewart BJ; Wilson C; Turnbull D
    Trials; 2013 Jul; 14():239. PubMed ID: 23902589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial.
    O'Carroll RE; Chambers JA; Brownlee L; Libby G; Steele RJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Oct; 142():118-27. PubMed ID: 26301484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual colonoscopy, optical colonoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial.
    You JJ; Liu Y; Kirby J; Vora P; Moayyedi P
    Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():296. PubMed ID: 26156248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors Associated with Informed Decisions and Participation in Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy.
    Smith SK; Simpson JM; Trevena LJ; McCaffery KJ
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Aug; 34(6):756-72. PubMed ID: 24421292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial.
    Green BB; Anderson ML; Chubak J; Fuller S; Meenan RT; Vernon SW
    Cancer; 2016 Jan; 122(2):312-21. PubMed ID: 26488332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial.
    Smith SK; Trevena L; Simpson JM; Barratt A; Nutbeam D; McCaffery KJ
    BMJ; 2010 Oct; 341():c5370. PubMed ID: 20978060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision Support and the Effectiveness of Web-based Delivery and Information Tailoring for Bowel Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Study.
    Flight IH; Wilson CJ; Zajac IT; Hart E; McGillivray JA
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2012 Sep; 1(2):e12. PubMed ID: 23611950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does access to a colorectal cancer screening website and/or a nurse-managed telephone help line provided to patients by their family physician increase fecal occult blood test uptake?: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial study protocol.
    Clouston K; Katz A; Martens PJ; Sisler J; Turner D; Lobchuk M; McClement S;
    BMC Cancer; 2012 May; 12():182. PubMed ID: 22607726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner.
    Cole SR; Young GP; Byrne D; Guy JR; Morcom J
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 12518003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of dietary restriction on participation in faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer.
    Cole SR; Young GP
    Med J Aust; 2001 Aug; 175(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 11587278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of changing stool collection processes on compliance in nationwide organized screening using a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in Korea: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Shin HY; Suh M; Baik HW; Choi KS; Park B; Jun JK; Lee CW; Oh JH; Lee YK; Han DS; Lee DH
    Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():461. PubMed ID: 25428164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.
    Steele RJC; Digby J; Chambers JA; O'Carroll RE
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):411. PubMed ID: 30991987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the effectiveness of a general practice intervention to improve uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.
    Dodd N; Carey M; Mansfield E; Oldmeadow C; Evans TJ
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2019 Oct; 43(5):464-469. PubMed ID: 31268211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial.
    Baker DW; Brown T; Buchanan DR; Weil J; Balsley K; Ranalli L; Lee JY; Cameron KA; Ferreira MR; Stephens Q; Goldman SN; Rademaker A; Wolf MS
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Aug; 174(8):1235-41. PubMed ID: 24934845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.