140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25886531)
1. Virtual Touch tissue quantification cannot assess breast cancer lesions except for ductal carcinomas in situ and small invasive cancers: a retrospective study.
Tada K; Nishioka K; Kikuchi Y; Niwa T; Seto Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 13():147. PubMed ID: 25886531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical application of a color map pattern on shear-wave elastography for invasive breast cancer.
Lee S; Jung Y; Bae Y
Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 26979640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound Breast Elastographic Evaluation of Mass-Forming Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ with Histological Correlation - New Findings for a Toothpaste Sign.
Leong LC; Sim LS; Jara-Lazaro AR; Tan PH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(5):2673-8. PubMed ID: 27268649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What are the characteristics of breast cancers misclassified as benign by quantitative ultrasound shear wave elastography?
Vinnicombe SJ; Whelehan P; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie CA; Jordan LB; Hubbard S; Evans AJ
Eur Radiol; 2014 Apr; 24(4):921-6. PubMed ID: 24326756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial experience of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) and ultrasound elastography in predicting breast cancer subtypes and staging.
Wang XL; Tao L; Zhou XL; Wei H; Sun JW
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():130-135. PubMed ID: 27718417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A non-invasive modality: the US virtual touch tissue quantification (VTTQ) for evaluation of breast cancer.
Tamaki K; Tamaki N; Kamada Y; Uehara K; Miyashita M; Ishida T; Sasano H
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Sep; 43(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 23911773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cost-effective handheld breast scanner for use in low-resource environments: a validation study.
Broach RB; Geha R; Englander BS; DeLaCruz L; Thrash H; Brooks AD
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 14(1):277. PubMed ID: 27793162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: Analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy.
Uhlig J; Fischer U; Surov A; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():9-16. PubMed ID: 29362157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radioactive seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: review of 1,000 consecutive procedures at a single institution.
McGhan LJ; McKeever SC; Pockaj BA; Wasif N; Giurescu ME; Walton HA; Gray RJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3096-101. PubMed ID: 21947587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SONOELASTOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF HIGH-RISK BREAST LESIONS AND DUCTAL CARCINOMA
Crnogorac M; Ivanac G; Tomasović-Lončarić Č; Žic R; Kelava T; Brkljačić B
Acta Clin Croat; 2019 Mar; 58(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 31363320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of automated breast volume scanning and hand- held ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer: an analysis of 5,566 patient evaluations.
Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Kim H; Chae EY; Hong MJ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(21):9101-5. PubMed ID: 25422185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differentiation of Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma
Shi J; Chen L; Wang B; Zhang H; Xu L; Ye J; Liu Y; Shao Y; Sun X; Zou Y
Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(3):286-291. PubMed ID: 35899956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.
Polat AV; Soran A; Andacoglu O; Kamali Polat A; McGuire K; Diego E; Johnson R
J BUON; 2013; 18(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 24065470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidental detection of clinically unexpected breast lesions by computed tomography.
Monzawa S; Washio T; Yasuoka R; Mitsuo M; Kadotani Y; Hanioka K
Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 23395815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A multicentered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas.
Lovrics PJ; Goldsmith CH; Hodgson N; McCready D; Gohla G; Boylan C; Cornacchi S; Reedijk M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3407-14. PubMed ID: 21533657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium.
van der Noordaa ME; Pengel KE; Groen E; van Werkhoven E; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Vogel W; Vrancken Peeters MJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25707349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence that molecular changes in cells occur before morphological alterations during the progression of breast ductal carcinoma.
Castro NP; Osório CA; Torres C; Bastos EP; Mourão-Neto M; Soares FA; Brentani HP; Carraro DM
Breast Cancer Res; 2008; 10(5):R87. PubMed ID: 18928525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
