These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25887041)

  • 1. Automatic selection of partitioning schemes for phylogenetic analyses using iterative k-means clustering of site rates.
    Frandsen PB; Calcott B; Mayer C; Lanfear R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Feb; 15(1):13. PubMed ID: 25887041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selecting optimal partitioning schemes for phylogenomic datasets.
    Lanfear R; Calcott B; Kainer D; Mayer C; Stamatakis A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Apr; 14():82. PubMed ID: 24742000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple method for data partitioning based on relative evolutionary rates.
    Rota J; Malm T; Chazot N; Peña C; Wahlberg N
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5498. PubMed ID: 30186687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses.
    Lanfear R; Calcott B; Ho SY; Guindon S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Jun; 29(6):1695-701. PubMed ID: 22319168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PartitionFinder 2: New Methods for Selecting Partitioned Models of Evolution for Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analyses.
    Lanfear R; Frandsen PB; Wright AM; Senfeld T; Calcott B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Mar; 34(3):772-773. PubMed ID: 28013191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical evaluation of partitioning schemes for phylogenetic analyses of mitogenomic data: an avian case study.
    Powell AF; Barker FK; Lanyon SM
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 23000817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Relative Importance of Modeling Site Pattern Heterogeneity Versus Partition-Wise Heterotachy in Phylogenomic Inference.
    Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
    Syst Biol; 2019 Nov; 68(6):1003-1019. PubMed ID: 31140564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. mPartition: A Model-Based Method for Partitioning Alignments.
    Le Kim T; Le Sy V
    J Mol Evol; 2020 Nov; 88(8-9):641-652. PubMed ID: 32864711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution.
    Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using multiple relaxed-clock models to estimate evolutionary timescales from DNA sequence data.
    Duchêne S; Ho SY
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Aug; 77():65-70. PubMed ID: 24747129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods for selecting fixed-effect models for heterogeneous codon evolution, with comments on their application to gene and genome data.
    Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Feb; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17288578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal data partitioning and a test case for ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) based on ten nuclear loci.
    Li C; Lu G; Ortí G
    Syst Biol; 2008 Aug; 57(4):519-39. PubMed ID: 18622808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian evolutionary model testing in the phylogenomics era: matching model complexity with computational efficiency.
    Baele G; Lemey P
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Aug; 29(16):1970-9. PubMed ID: 23766415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of partitioning on phylogenetic inference.
    Kainer D; Lanfear R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):1611-27. PubMed ID: 25660373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the Impact of Anatomical Partitioning on Summary Topologies Obtained with Bayesian Phylogenetic Analyses of Morphological Data.
    Casali DM; Freitas FV; Perini FA
    Syst Biol; 2023 May; 72(1):62-77. PubMed ID: 36472372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phylogenetic relationships among iguanian lizards using alternative partitioning methods and TSHZ1: a new phylogenetic marker for reptiles.
    Schulte JA; Cartwright EM
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Feb; 50(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 19026752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nucleotide substitution rates for the full set of mitochondrial protein-coding genes in Coleoptera.
    Pons J; Ribera I; Bertranpetit J; Balke M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Aug; 56(2):796-807. PubMed ID: 20152911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phylogenetic mixture models can reduce node-density artifacts.
    Venditti C; Meade A; Pagel M
    Syst Biol; 2008 Apr; 57(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 18432549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Searching for the optimal data partitioning strategy in mitochondrial phylogenomics: a phylogeny of Acridoidea (Insecta: Orthoptera: Caelifera) as a case study.
    Leavitt JR; Hiatt KD; Whiting MF; Song H
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2013 May; 67(2):494-508. PubMed ID: 23454468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating the number and assignment of clock models in analyses of multigene datasets.
    Duchêne S; Foster CS; Ho SY
    Bioinformatics; 2016 May; 32(9):1281-5. PubMed ID: 26743512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.