271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25887133)
1. Newborn hearing screening: analysis and outcomes after 100,000 births in Upper-Normandy French region.
Caluraud S; Marcolla-Bouchetemblé A; de Barros A; Moreau-Lenoir F; de Sevin E; Rerolle S; Charrière E; Lecler-Scarcella V; Billet F; Obstoy MF; Amstutz-Montadert I; Marie JP; Lerosey Y
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jun; 79(6):829-833. PubMed ID: 25887133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Universal newborn hearing screening: a 27-month experience in the French region of Champagne-Ardenne.
Lévêque M; Schmidt P; Leroux B; Danvin JB; Langagne T; Labrousse M; Chays A
Acta Paediatr; 2007 Aug; 96(8):1150-4. PubMed ID: 17578491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening?
Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neonatal hearing screening - does failure in TEOAE screening matter when the AABR test is passed?
Gellrich D; Gröger M; Echternach M; Eder K; Huber P
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1273-1283. PubMed ID: 37831131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.
Xu ZM; Cheng WX; Yang XL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Oct; 75(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 21802153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Neonatal hearing screening. A comparison of automatic auditory brainstem audiometry and otoacoustic emissions].
Pedersen L; Møller TR; Wetke R; Ovesen T
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(8):642-6. PubMed ID: 18364157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early detection of neonatal hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response over 10 years of experience.
Escobar-Ipuz FA; Soria-Bretones C; García-Jiménez MA; Cueto EM; Torres Aranda AM; Sotos JM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109647. PubMed ID: 31470205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response in Neonatal Hearing Screening.
Levit Y; Himmelfarb M; Dollberg S
Pediatrics; 2015 Sep; 136(3):e641-7. PubMed ID: 26324873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing loss among high-risk newborns admitted to a tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
Khairy MA; Abuelhamed WA; Ahmed RS; El Fouly HES; Elhawary IM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jul; 31(13):1756-1761. PubMed ID: 28482715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Lin HY; Lin G
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):788-92. PubMed ID: 17948357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of gentamicin and levels of ambient sound on hearing screening outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit: A pilot study.
Garinis AC; Liao S; Cross CP; Galati J; Middaugh JL; Mace JC; Wood AM; McEvoy L; Moneta L; Lubianski T; Coopersmith N; Vigo N; Hart C; Riddle A; Ettinger O; Nold C; Durham H; MacArthur C; McEvoy C; Steyger PS
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 97():42-50. PubMed ID: 28483249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns.
Shang Y; Hao W; Gao Z; Xu C; Ru Y; Ni D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():141-145. PubMed ID: 27863628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes with OAE and AABR screening in the first 48 h--Implications for newborn hearing screening in developing countries.
van Dyk M; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1034-40. PubMed ID: 25921078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry.
Mathur NN; Dhawan R
J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Newborn hearing screening at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Auditory Brainstem Maturation in preterm infants.
Ciorba A; Hatzopoulos S; Corazzi V; Cogliandolo C; Aimoni C; Bianchini C; Stomeo F; Pelucchi S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 123():110-115. PubMed ID: 31096068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical analysis of three newborn hearing screening protocols.
Freitas VS; Alvarenga Kde F; Bevilacqua MC; Martinez MA; Costa OA
Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19838565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem responses for pre-discharge neonatal hearing screening.
Clarke P; Iqbal M; Mitchell S
Int J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 42(8):443-7. PubMed ID: 14658852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening to detect permanent childhood hearing impairment in neonates transferred from the newborn nursery.
Dauman R; Roussey M; Belot V; Denoyelle F; Roman S; Gavilan-Cellié I; Ruzza-Surroca I; Calmels MN; Lina-Granade G; Houssin E; Charlemagne A; Garabedian N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Mar; 73(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 19136157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]