These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
871 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25887253)
1. 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: comparison of operative data and pentafecta rates: a single cohort study. Bove P; Iacovelli V; Celestino F; De Carlo F; Vespasiani G; Finazzi Agrò E BMC Urol; 2015 Feb; 15(1):12. PubMed ID: 25887253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of pentafecta rates for a single surgeon. Asimakopoulos AD; Miano R; Di Lorenzo N; Spera E; Vespasiani G; Mugnier C Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4297-304. PubMed ID: 23807752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Patel VR; Sivaraman A; Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Palmer KJ; Orvieto MA; Camacho I; Coughlin G; Rocco B Eur Urol; 2011 May; 59(5):702-7. PubMed ID: 21296482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study. Akand M; Erdogru T; Avci E; Ates M Int J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 26212891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Pentafecta and Trifecta achievements. Jazayeri SB; Weissman B; Samadi DB Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2018 Feb; 70(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 28882030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Functional outcomes of transvesical single-site versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer]. Liu S; Wen XQ Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Nov; 20(11):1012-9. PubMed ID: 25577838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative, pathologic, and early continence outcomes comparing three-dimensional and two-dimensional display systems for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--a retrospective, single-surgeon study. Aykan S; Singhal P; Nguyen DP; Yigit A; Tuken M; Yakut E; Colakerol A; Sulejman S; Semercioz A J Endourol; 2014 May; 28(5):539-43. PubMed ID: 24397422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status. Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Grande S; Morra I; Scarpa RM Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1377-83. PubMed ID: 19243886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pentafecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: first 100 cases in Latinoamerican Hospital. Gárate J; Sánchez-Salas R; Valero R; Matheus R; León A; Dávila H Actas Urol Esp; 2015; 39(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 24974068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of pure versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon. Park B; Kim W; Jeong BC; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Seo SI Scand J Urol; 2013 Feb; 47(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 22835035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Five-year Outcomes for a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Bertolo R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Checcucci E; De Luca S; Passera R; Scarpa RM Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jan; 4(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 28753822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Moulin M; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 23245815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer]. Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: comparative analysis of operative and pathologic outcomes for three techniques with a single surgeon's experience. Akand M; Celik O; Avci E; Duman I; Erdogru T Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Feb; 19(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 25753865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series. Papachristos A; Basto M; Te Marvelde L; Moon D ANZ J Surg; 2015 Mar; 85(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 24730750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [3D versus 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer]. Xu B; Liu N; Jiang H; Chen SQ; Yang Y; Zhang XW; Sun C; Zhang LJ; Liu J; Sha GZ; Zhu WD; Chen M Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Oct; 21(10):904-7. PubMed ID: 26665679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]