These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25887260)

  • 1. Watch out! Medial frontal cortex is activated by cues signaling potential changes in response demands.
    van Noordt SJ; Desjardins JA; Segalowitz SJ
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jul; 114():356-70. PubMed ID: 25887260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A functional classification of medial frontal negativity ERPs: Theta oscillations and single subject effects.
    Van Noordt SJ; Campopiano A; Segalowitz SJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Sep; 53(9):1317-34. PubMed ID: 27338558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conflict monitoring and error processing: new insights from simultaneous EEG-fMRI.
    Iannaccone R; Hauser TU; Staempfli P; Walitza S; Brandeis D; Brem S
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 105():395-407. PubMed ID: 25462691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: a combined fMRI and TMS study.
    Rushworth MF; Hadland KA; Paus T; Sipila PK
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 May; 87(5):2577-92. PubMed ID: 11976394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring force errors: medial-frontal negativity in a unimanual force-production task.
    Armbrecht AS; Gibbons H; Stahl J
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Jan; 49(1):56-72. PubMed ID: 21895690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Error-related medial frontal theta activity predicts cingulate-related structural connectivity.
    Cohen MX
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1373-83. PubMed ID: 21195774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward a more sophisticated response representation in theories of medial frontal performance monitoring: The effects of motor similarity and motor asymmetries.
    Hochman EY; Orr JM; Gehring WJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Feb; 24(2):414-25. PubMed ID: 23064106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive control in the eye of the beholder: Electrocortical theta and alpha modulation during response preparation in a cued saccade task.
    van Noordt SJ; Desjardins JA; Gogo CE; Tekok-Kilic A; Segalowitz SJ
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jan; 145(Pt A):82-95. PubMed ID: 27666384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological responses to errors and feedback in the process of action regulation.
    Luu P; Tucker DM; Derryberry D; Reed M; Poulsen C
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Jan; 14(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 12564753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.
    Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Caffeine strengthens action monitoring: evidence from the error-related negativity.
    Tieges Z; Richard Ridderinkhof K; Snel J; Kok A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 21(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 15325416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERP correlates of dual mechanisms of control in the counting Stroop task.
    West R; Bailey K
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Oct; 49(10):1309-18. PubMed ID: 22958264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive information and error processing: the role of medial-frontal cortex during motor control.
    Krigolson OE; Holroyd CB
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jul; 44(4):586-95. PubMed ID: 17437555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retest reliability of medial frontal negativities during performance monitoring.
    Segalowitz SJ; Santesso DL; Murphy TI; Homan D; Chantziantoniou DK; Khan S
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 20030755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. N2 event-related potential correlates of response inhibition in an auditory Go/Nogo task.
    Kaiser S; Weiss O; Hill H; Markela-Lerenc J; Kiefer M; Weisbrod M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 16298004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Delayed monitoring of accuracy errors compared to commission errors in ACC.
    Bediou B; Koban L; Rosset S; Pourtois G; Sander D
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):1925-36. PubMed ID: 22353628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional connectivity separates switching operations in the posterior lateral frontal cortex.
    Stelzel C; Basten U; Fiebach CJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3529-39. PubMed ID: 21568635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of mismatch negativity.
    Restuccia D; Della Marca G; Marra C; Rubino M; Valeriani M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):891-9. PubMed ID: 16289727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.